public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: George Anzinger <george@mvista.com>
To: Keith Owens <kaos@ocs.com.au>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	dwalker@mvista.com, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.13-rc4-V0.7.52-01
Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2005 19:12:46 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <42F0281E.4030001@mvista.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4094.1123033708@kao2.melbourne.sgi.com>

Keith Owens wrote:
> On Tue, 02 Aug 2005 18:12:27 -0700, 
> George Anzinger <george@mvista.com> wrote:
> 
>>How about something like:
>>	if (current + THREAD_SIZE/sizeof(long) - (regs + sizeof(pt_regs)) > MAGIC)
> 
> 
> current points to the current struct task, regs points to the kernel
> stack.  Those two data areas can be completely separate, as they are on
> i386.  Also i386 uses a separate kernel stack for interrupts.

Acually I must mean the thread_info and not current.  i386 only uses a 
seperate stack if you use 4K stacks.  I think others use seperate 
interrupt stacks, however :(.  Also, on thinking on it, I think some 
archs don't call the registers pt_regs either.  Oh, well, it was a 
thought...

Waiting for its brother... :)
-- 
George Anzinger   george@mvista.com
HRT (High-res-timers):  http://sourceforge.net/projects/high-res-timers/

  reply	other threads:[~2005-08-03  2:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 66+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-07-30 16:03 [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.13-rc4-V0.7.52-01 Ingo Molnar
2005-07-30 20:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
2005-07-30 20:52   ` Ingo Molnar
2005-07-31  4:47     ` Lee Revell
2005-07-31  6:38       ` Ingo Molnar
2005-08-01  4:45         ` Lee Revell
2005-08-01 21:08           ` Ingo Molnar
2005-08-01 21:12             ` Ingo Molnar
2005-08-02 13:56           ` Steven Rostedt
2005-08-02 14:05             ` Lee Revell
2005-08-02 14:20               ` Steven Rostedt
2005-08-02 15:37                 ` 2.6.13-rc3 -> sluggish PS2 keyboard (was Re: [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.13-rc4-V0.7.52-01) Lee Revell
2005-08-02 15:44                   ` Vojtech Pavlik
2005-08-02 15:46                     ` Lee Revell
2005-08-02 15:47                     ` Lee Revell
2005-08-02 15:53                       ` Steven Rostedt
2005-08-02 15:55                       ` Vojtech Pavlik
2005-08-02 15:55                   ` Dmitry Torokhov
2005-08-02 15:38                 ` [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.13-rc4-V0.7.52-01 Lee Revell
2005-07-31  8:03     ` Peter Zijlstra
2005-07-31 10:44       ` Ingo Molnar
2005-07-31 15:56         ` [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.13-rc4-V0.7.52-05 Gene Heskett
2005-08-01 18:22 ` [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.13-rc4-V0.7.52-01 Steven Rostedt
2005-08-01 19:49   ` Steven Rostedt
2005-08-01 20:52   ` Ingo Molnar
2005-08-01 21:09     ` Daniel Walker
2005-08-01 21:15       ` Ingo Molnar
2005-08-02  0:43       ` Steven Rostedt
2005-08-01 21:15     ` Steven Rostedt
2005-08-01 21:23       ` Ingo Molnar
2005-08-01 21:20   ` Daniel Walker
2005-08-02  0:53     ` Steven Rostedt
2005-08-02 10:19       ` Ingo Molnar
2005-08-02 19:45         ` Steven Rostedt
2005-08-02 19:56           ` Steven Rostedt
2005-08-02 23:38           ` Daniel Walker
2005-08-03  0:00             ` Steven Rostedt
2005-08-03  1:12               ` George Anzinger
2005-08-03  1:48                 ` Keith Owens
2005-08-03  2:12                   ` George Anzinger [this message]
2005-08-03  2:25               ` Daniel Walker
2005-08-03  2:42                 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-08-03  2:58                   ` Daniel Walker
2005-08-03 10:30                     ` Steven Rostedt
2005-08-03 15:10                       ` Daniel Walker
2005-08-03 10:37                     ` [Question] arch-independent way to differentiate between user and kernel Steven Rostedt
2005-08-03 10:48                       ` Ingo Molnar
2005-08-03 12:18                         ` Steven Rostedt
2005-08-03 10:56                       ` [Question] arch-independent way to differentiate between user andkernel linux-os (Dick Johnson)
2005-08-03 11:44                         ` Steven Rostedt
2005-08-03 12:04                           ` Ingo Molnar
2005-08-03 12:30                             ` Steven Rostedt
2005-08-03 14:50                     ` [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.13-rc4-V0.7.52-01 Steven Rostedt
2005-08-03 15:15                       ` Steven Rostedt
2005-08-03 15:57                         ` Steven Rostedt
2005-08-03 16:44                       ` Steven Rostedt
     [not found]                         ` <20050812125844.GA13357@elte.hu>
2005-08-26  4:24                           ` Steven Rostedt
2005-08-26  6:08                             ` Ingo Molnar
2005-08-26 11:20                               ` Steven Rostedt
2005-08-30 10:58                                 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2005-08-30 11:14                                   ` Ingo Molnar
2005-08-30 11:00                             ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2005-08-02  3:55     ` Steven Rostedt
2005-08-02  4:07       ` Daniel Walker
2005-08-02 14:53 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-08-04 12:20 ` Andrzej Nowak

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=42F0281E.4030001@mvista.com \
    --to=george@mvista.com \
    --cc=dwalker@mvista.com \
    --cc=kaos@ocs.com.au \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox