From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262056AbVHCFRS (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Aug 2005 01:17:18 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262060AbVHCFRS (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Aug 2005 01:17:18 -0400 Received: from dgate1.fujitsu-siemens.com ([217.115.66.35]:17454 "EHLO dgate1.fujitsu-siemens.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262056AbVHCFRQ (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Aug 2005 01:17:16 -0400 X-SBRSScore: None X-IronPort-AV: i="3.95,162,1120428000"; d="scan'208"; a="13515670:sNHT26907328" Message-ID: <42F05359.7030006@fujitsu-siemens.com> Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2005 07:17:13 +0200 From: Martin Wilck Organization: Fujitsu Siemens Computers User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.5 (X11/20040208) X-Accept-Language: de, en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jens Axboe Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jeff Garzik , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, "Wichert, Gerhard" Subject: Re: ahci, SActive flag, and the HD activity LED References: <42EF93F8.8050601@fujitsu-siemens.com> <20050802163519.GB3710@suse.de> In-Reply-To: <20050802163519.GB3710@suse.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Jens Axboe wrote: >>If I am reading the specs correctly, that'd mean the ahci driver is >>wrong in setting the SActive bit. > > I completely agree, that was my reading of the spec as well and hence my > original posts about this in the NCQ thread. Have you (or has anybody else) also seen the wrong behavior of the activity LED? Regards Martin -- Martin Wilck Phone: +49 5251 8 15113 Fujitsu Siemens Computers Fax: +49 5251 8 20409 Heinz-Nixdorf-Ring 1 mailto:Martin.Wilck@Fujitsu-Siemens.com D-33106 Paderborn http://www.fujitsu-siemens.com/primergy