From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262223AbVHCLIo (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Aug 2005 07:08:44 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262224AbVHCLIo (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Aug 2005 07:08:44 -0400 Received: from mail1.skjellin.no ([80.239.42.67]:27624 "EHLO mx1.skjellin.no") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262220AbVHCLIn (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Aug 2005 07:08:43 -0400 Message-ID: <42F0A5B8.6060300@tomt.net> Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2005 13:08:40 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Andr=E9_Tomt?= User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Windows/20050716) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Martin Wilck CC: Jens Axboe , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jeff Garzik , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, "Wichert, Gerhard" Subject: Re: ahci, SActive flag, and the HD activity LED References: <42EF93F8.8050601@fujitsu-siemens.com> <20050802163519.GB3710@suse.de> <42F05359.7030006@fujitsu-siemens.com> In-Reply-To: <42F05359.7030006@fujitsu-siemens.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Martin Wilck wrote: > Jens Axboe wrote: > >>> If I am reading the specs correctly, that'd mean the ahci driver is >>> wrong in setting the SActive bit. >> >> >> I completely agree, that was my reading of the spec as well and hence my >> original posts about this in the NCQ thread. > > > Have you (or has anybody else) also seen the wrong behavior of the > activity LED? I have, Asus P5LD2 i945P, ICH7R AHCI controller, Hitachi Deskstar T7K250 250GB "SATA2" drives. Kernel 2.6.12.x