public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
To: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>,
	Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, Robin Holt <holt@sgi.com>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 2.6.13-rc4] fix get_user_pages bug
Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2005 22:13:10 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <42F0B4D6.5030604@yahoo.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0508031231540.13845@goblin.wat.veritas.com>

Hugh Dickins wrote:

> Stupidity was the reason I thought handle_mm_fault couldn't be inline:
> I was picturing it static inline within mm/memory.c, failed to make the
> great intellectual leap you've achieved by moving it to include/linux/mm.h.
> 

Well it was one of my finer moments, so don't be too hard on
yourself.

> 
> No, I don't think it would break anything: it's just an historic oddity,
> used to be -1 for failure, and only got given a name recently, I think
> when wli added the proper major/minor counting.
> 
> Your version of the patch looks less hacky to me (not requiring
> VM_FAULT_WRITE_EXPECTED arg), though we could perfectly well remove
> that at leisure by adding VM_FAULT_WRITE case into all the arches in
> 2.6.14 (which might be preferable to leaving the __inline obscurity?).
> 

Well depends on what they want I suppose. Does it even make sense
to expose VM_FAULT_WRITE to arch code if it will just fall through
to VM_FAULT_MINOR?

With my earlier VM_FAULT_RACE thing, you can squint and say that's
a different case to VM_FAULT_MINOR - and accordingly not increment
the minor fault count. Afterall, minor faults *seem* to track count
of modifications made to the pte entry minus major faults, rather
than the number of times the hardware traps. I say this because we
increment the number in get_user_pages too.

But...

> I don't mind either way, but since you've not yet found an actual
> error in mine, I'd prefer you to make yours a tidyup patch on top,
> Signed-off-by your own good self, and let Linus decide whether he
> wants to apply yours on top or not.  Or perhaps the decision rests
> for the moment with Robin, whether he gets his customer to test
> yours or mine - whichever is tested is the one which should go in.
> 

I agree that for the moment we probably just want something that
works. I'd be just as happy to go with your patch as is for now.

Nick

-- 
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.

Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com 

  reply	other threads:[~2005-08-03 12:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 63+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20050801032258.A465C180EC0@magilla.sf.frob.com>
2005-08-01  8:21 ` [patch 2.6.13-rc4] fix get_user_pages bug Nick Piggin
2005-08-01  9:19   ` Ingo Molnar
2005-08-01  9:27     ` Nick Piggin
2005-08-01 10:15       ` Ingo Molnar
2005-08-01 10:57         ` Nick Piggin
2005-08-01 19:43           ` Hugh Dickins
2005-08-01 20:08             ` Linus Torvalds
2005-08-01 21:06               ` Hugh Dickins
2005-08-01 21:51                 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-08-01 22:01                   ` Linus Torvalds
2005-08-02 12:01                     ` Martin Schwidefsky
2005-08-02 12:26                       ` Hugh Dickins
2005-08-02 12:28                         ` Nick Piggin
2005-08-02 15:19                         ` Martin Schwidefsky
2005-08-02 15:30                       ` Linus Torvalds
2005-08-02 16:03                         ` Hugh Dickins
2005-08-02 16:25                           ` Linus Torvalds
2005-08-02 17:02                             ` Linus Torvalds
2005-08-02 17:27                               ` Hugh Dickins
2005-08-02 17:21                             ` Hugh Dickins
2005-08-02 18:47                               ` Linus Torvalds
2005-08-02 19:20                                 ` Hugh Dickins
2005-08-02 19:54                                   ` Linus Torvalds
2005-08-02 20:55                                     ` Hugh Dickins
2005-08-03 10:24                                       ` Nick Piggin
2005-08-03 11:47                                         ` Hugh Dickins
2005-08-03 12:13                                           ` Nick Piggin [this message]
2005-08-03 16:12                                         ` Linus Torvalds
2005-08-03 16:39                                           ` Linus Torvalds
2005-08-03 16:42                                             ` Linus Torvalds
2005-08-03 17:12                                           ` Hugh Dickins
2005-08-03 23:03                                           ` Nick Piggin
2005-08-04 14:14                                           ` Alexander Nyberg
2005-08-04 14:30                                             ` Nick Piggin
2005-08-04 15:00                                               ` Alexander Nyberg
2005-08-04 15:35                                                 ` Hugh Dickins
2005-08-04 16:32                                                   ` Russell King
2005-08-04 15:36                                                 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-08-04 16:29                                               ` Russell King
2005-08-03 10:24                                       ` Martin Schwidefsky
2005-08-03 11:57                                         ` Hugh Dickins
2005-08-02 16:44                         ` Martin Schwidefsky
2005-08-01 15:42   ` Linus Torvalds
2005-08-01 18:18     ` Linus Torvalds
2005-08-03  8:24       ` Robin Holt
2005-08-03 11:31         ` Hugh Dickins
2005-08-04 11:48           ` Robin Holt
2005-08-04 13:04             ` Hugh Dickins
2005-08-01 19:29     ` Hugh Dickins
2005-08-01 19:48       ` Linus Torvalds
2005-08-02  8:07         ` Martin Schwidefsky
2005-08-01 19:57       ` Andrew Morton
2005-08-01 20:16         ` Linus Torvalds
2005-08-02  0:14     ` Nick Piggin
2005-08-02  1:27     ` Nick Piggin
2005-08-02  3:45       ` Linus Torvalds
2005-08-02  4:25         ` Nick Piggin
2005-08-02  4:35           ` Linus Torvalds
2005-08-01 20:03   ` Hugh Dickins
2005-08-01 20:12     ` Andrew Morton
2005-08-01 20:26       ` Linus Torvalds
2005-08-01 20:51       ` Hugh Dickins
2005-08-02 14:02 Dan Higgins

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=42F0B4D6.5030604@yahoo.com.au \
    --to=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=holt@sgi.com \
    --cc=hugh@veritas.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=roland@redhat.com \
    --cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox