From: "Michael Kerrisk" <michael.kerrisk@gmx.net>
To: Ulrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com>
Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
jakub@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
bert.hubert@netherlabs.nl, akpm@osdl.org, mtk-lkml@gmx.net
Subject: Re: pselect() modifying timeout
Date: Fri, 05 Aug 2005 22:08:23 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <42F3E357.3257.1BD78615@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <42F37CC5.6030206@redhat.com>
> Michael Kerrisk wrote:
> > Please consider making Linux pselect() conform to POSIX on this
> > point.
>
> There is no question the implementation will conform. But this not
> dependent on changing the syscall interface. We deliberately decided to
> not require the kernel interface to be different from select. The
> userlevel code will take care of the difference. The kernel code is good
> as proposed.
Okay -- thanks for the info.
Cheers,
Michael
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-08-05 20:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-06-10 22:58 Add pselect, ppoll system calls David Woodhouse
2005-06-12 22:48 ` Alan Cox
2005-06-13 0:26 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-06-13 1:16 ` jnf
2005-06-13 3:26 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-06-13 6:22 ` Ulrich Drepper
2005-06-13 9:16 ` bert hubert
2005-06-13 9:41 ` David Woodhouse
2005-06-13 11:05 ` Christoph Hellwig
2005-06-13 11:14 ` Jakub Jelinek
2005-06-13 11:24 ` David Woodhouse
2005-06-13 15:38 ` Ulrich Drepper
2005-06-13 16:02 ` David Woodhouse
2005-06-13 16:10 ` Ulrich Drepper
2005-06-13 16:29 ` David Woodhouse
2005-06-13 16:31 ` Ulrich Drepper
2005-06-13 21:58 ` David Woodhouse
2005-06-13 22:01 ` Ulrich Drepper
2005-06-13 16:36 ` Jakub Jelinek
2005-06-15 11:36 ` David Woodhouse
2005-08-05 10:42 ` pselect() modifying timeout Michael Kerrisk
2005-08-05 14:50 ` Ulrich Drepper
2005-08-05 20:08 ` Michael Kerrisk [this message]
2005-08-08 11:10 ` Alan Cox
2005-08-05 11:58 ` Add pselect, ppoll system calls Michael Kerrisk
2005-08-05 12:49 ` Michael Kerrisk
2005-08-25 0:04 ` David Woodhouse
2005-08-25 0:34 ` Ulrich Drepper
2005-08-26 6:46 ` Michael Kerrisk
2005-06-13 15:35 ` Ulrich Drepper
2005-06-13 7:23 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2005-06-13 7:29 ` David Woodhouse
2005-06-13 22:56 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2005-06-13 11:15 ` Alan Cox
2005-06-13 11:27 ` David Woodhouse
2005-06-13 15:40 ` Ulrich Drepper
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=42F3E357.3257.1BD78615@localhost \
--to=michael.kerrisk@gmx.net \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=bert.hubert@netherlabs.nl \
--cc=drepper@redhat.com \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=jakub@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtk-lkml@gmx.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox