From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263115AbVHEUNo (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Aug 2005 16:13:44 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263106AbVHEULm (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Aug 2005 16:11:42 -0400 Received: from pop.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:1985 "HELO mail.gmx.net") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S263066AbVHEUIs (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Aug 2005 16:08:48 -0400 X-Authenticated: #2864774 From: "Michael Kerrisk" To: Ulrich Drepper Date: Fri, 05 Aug 2005 22:08:23 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: pselect() modifying timeout CC: David Woodhouse , jakub@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bert.hubert@netherlabs.nl, akpm@osdl.org, mtk-lkml@gmx.net Message-ID: <42F3E357.3257.1BD78615@localhost> In-reply-to: <42F37CC5.6030206@redhat.com> References: <31556.1123238544@www44.gmx.net> X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Windows (4.21c) Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-description: Mail message body X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Michael Kerrisk wrote: > > Please consider making Linux pselect() conform to POSIX on this > > point. > > There is no question the implementation will conform. But this not > dependent on changing the syscall interface. We deliberately decided to > not require the kernel interface to be different from select. The > userlevel code will take care of the difference. The kernel code is good > as proposed. Okay -- thanks for the info. Cheers, Michael