From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753027AbVHGWSm (ORCPT ); Sun, 7 Aug 2005 18:18:42 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753029AbVHGWSm (ORCPT ); Sun, 7 Aug 2005 18:18:42 -0400 Received: from tron.kn.vutbr.cz ([147.229.191.152]:29447 "EHLO tron.kn.vutbr.cz") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753027AbVHGWSl (ORCPT ); Sun, 7 Aug 2005 18:18:41 -0400 Message-ID: <42F68896.8050604@stud.feec.vutbr.cz> Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2005 00:17:58 +0200 From: Michal Schmidt User-Agent: Debian Thunderbird 1.0.6 (X11/20050802) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Pavel Machek CC: Andrew Morton , davej@codemonkey.org.uk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: amd64-agp vs. swsusp References: <42DD67D9.60201@stud.feec.vutbr.cz> <20050804142548.5b813700.akpm@osdl.org> <20050804214044.GD1780@elf.ucw.cz> In-Reply-To: <20050804214044.GD1780@elf.ucw.cz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "tron.kn.vutbr.cz", has tested this incoming email. See other headers to know if the email has beed identified as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or block similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. ____ Content analysis details: (-4.2 points, 6.0 required) ____ pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------- 0.7 FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS From: ends in numbers -4.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] ____ Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Pavel Machek wrote: > I assume it is in -rc6, too; it is long-standing bug and I am not > aware of any attempts at fixing it. Please file bug report, assign to > me. I've filed it as Bug 5018. Michal