public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Zachary Amsden <zach@vmware.com>
To: Chris Wright <chrisw@osdl.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
	"Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@mbligh.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Pratap Subrahmanyam <pratap@vmware.com>,
	virtualization@lists.osdl.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] abstract out bits of ldt.c
Date: Sun, 07 Aug 2005 18:16:04 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <42F6B254.2090404@vmware.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050808010828.GU7762@shell0.pdx.osdl.net>

Chris Wright wrote:

>* Zachary Amsden (zach@vmware.com) wrote:
>  
>
>>Does Xen assume page aligned descriptor tables?  I assume from this 
>>    
>>
>
>Yes.
>
>  
>
>>patch and snippets I have gathered from others, that is a yes, and other 
>>things here imply that DT pages are not shadowed.  If so, Xen itself 
>>must have live segments in the GDT pages, so how do you allocate space 
>>for the per-CPU GDT pages on SMP?
>>    
>>
>
>early during boot.
>  
>

Doesn't that require 16 pages per CPU?  That seems excessive to impose 
on a native build.  Perhaps we could get away with 1 page per CPU for 
the GDT on native boots and bump that up to 16 if compiling for a 
virtualized sub-architecture - i.e. move GDT to a page aligned struct 
for native (doesn't cost too much), and give it MACH_GDT_PAGES of space 
which is defined by the sub-architecture.

Let's take this thread over to virtualization@lists.osdl.org as well.

Zach

  reply	other threads:[~2005-08-08  1:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-08-07 23:20 [PATCH] abstract out bits of ldt.c Martin J. Bligh
2005-08-07 23:44 ` Chris Wright
2005-08-07 23:57   ` Martin J. Bligh
2005-08-07 23:59     ` Chris Wright
2005-08-08  0:41     ` Andrew Morton
2005-08-08  0:46       ` Chris Wright
2005-08-08  1:04         ` Zachary Amsden
2005-08-08  1:08           ` Chris Wright
2005-08-08  1:16             ` Zachary Amsden [this message]
2005-08-08  1:36               ` Chris Wright
2005-08-08  1:21           ` Martin J. Bligh
2005-08-08  0:59       ` Martin J. Bligh
     [not found]       ` <20050808113014.GA15165@elte.hu>
     [not found]         ` <20050808095755.23810b15.akpm@osdl.org>
2005-08-09  9:23           ` Ingo Molnar
2005-08-09  9:28             ` Christoph Hellwig
2005-08-08  8:41 ` Dave Hansen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=42F6B254.2090404@vmware.com \
    --to=zach@vmware.com \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=chrisw@osdl.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mbligh@mbligh.org \
    --cc=pratap@vmware.com \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.osdl.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox