From: Stefan Seyfried <seife@suse.de>
To: Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org>
Cc: tony@atomide.com, ck@vds.kolivas.org,
tuukka.tikkanen@elektrobit.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
tytso@mit.edu
Subject: Re: [patch] i386 dynamic ticks 2.6.13-rc4 (code reordered)
Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2005 07:43:05 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <42F6F0E9.1050606@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200508070100.55319.kernel@kolivas.org>
Con Kolivas wrote:
>> When I enabled dynamic tick using:
>>
>> echo 1 > /sys/devices/system/timer/timer0/dyn_tick_state
>>
>> The number of ticks dropped down to 60-70 HZ, bus mastering activity
>> jumpped up to being almost always active,
>
> Anyone know why this would happen?
This is just a guess, without any actual code-reading:
Maybe the C-state decision process just relies on being called every
tick, so "after X ticks with no BM activity, go to next deeper C state".
As long as 1000 ticks per second are coming in, everything is fine and
we enter C[n+1] after X miliseconds without BM activity. Now if there
are only 60-70 ticks per second, you never get X ticks without BM
activity so you never go deeper than C2.
Just a guess.
--
Stefan Seyfried \ "I didn't want to write for pay. I
QA / R&D Team Mobile Devices \ wanted to be paid for what I write."
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Nürnberg \ -- Leonard Cohen
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-08-08 7:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-08-02 4:43 [patch] i386 dynamic ticks 2.6.13-rc4 (code reordered) Con Kolivas
2005-08-02 5:35 ` [ck] " Michael Marineau
2005-08-02 5:49 ` Con Kolivas
2005-08-02 5:52 ` Lee Revell
2005-08-02 5:56 ` Con Kolivas
2005-08-02 6:24 ` Lee Revell
2005-08-02 7:17 ` Tony Lindgren
2005-08-02 7:39 ` Con Kolivas
2005-08-02 8:15 ` Tony Lindgren
2005-08-02 10:54 ` Con Kolivas
2005-08-02 11:31 ` Tony Lindgren
2005-08-02 12:04 ` Con Kolivas
2005-08-02 7:21 ` Tony Lindgren
2005-08-02 14:01 ` Avuton Olrich
2005-08-02 14:05 ` Con Kolivas
2005-08-06 14:54 ` Theodore Ts'o
2005-08-06 15:00 ` Con Kolivas
2005-08-08 5:43 ` Stefan Seyfried [this message]
2005-08-08 21:54 ` Pavel Machek
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-08-08 18:37 Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2005-08-10 6:44 ` Thomas Renninger
2005-08-10 6:57 ` Con Kolivas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=42F6F0E9.1050606@suse.de \
--to=seife@suse.de \
--cc=ck@vds.kolivas.org \
--cc=kernel@kolivas.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
--cc=tuukka.tikkanen@elektrobit.com \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox