From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965212AbVHJRNd (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Aug 2005 13:13:33 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S965218AbVHJRNd (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Aug 2005 13:13:33 -0400 Received: from mta09-winn.ispmail.ntl.com ([81.103.221.49]:20473 "EHLO mta09-winn.ispmail.ntl.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965212AbVHJRNc (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Aug 2005 13:13:32 -0400 Message-ID: <42FA364C.9090605@gentoo.org> Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 18:15:56 +0100 From: Daniel Drake User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (X11/20050723) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kristoffer Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: captive-ntfs FUSE support? References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Kristoffer wrote: > why?: > Since LUFS is no longer maintained and FUSE is. since to use the LUFIS > bridge you have to install LUFS, This is not true. lufis is a compatibility layer on top of FUSE which provides the same API as lufs (thereby allowing you to load lufs modules into fuse). It does not actually rely on any part of lufs. As for captive, I don't think its worth the effort. It has severe memory problems and Linux-NTFS development is going quite fast anyway. Daniel