From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965252AbVHJSSr (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Aug 2005 14:18:47 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S965246AbVHJSSr (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Aug 2005 14:18:47 -0400 Received: from mail.dvmed.net ([216.237.124.58]:929 "EHLO mail.dvmed.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965240AbVHJSSr (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Aug 2005 14:18:47 -0400 Message-ID: <42FA4502.8000807@pobox.com> Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 14:18:42 -0400 From: Jeff Garzik User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6-1.1.fc4 (X11/20050720) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Michael Thonke CC: linux mailing-list Subject: Re: NCQ support NVidia NForce4 (CK804) SATAII References: <42FA4355.7010004@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <42FA4355.7010004@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Michael Thonke wrote: > Hello Jeff, > > I would like to ask what the plans/timeplan to implement NCQ support for > NVidia NForce4(CK804) SATAII based chipsets? Fact is that is it possible > to use NCQ with NForce4 SATAII on Windows system, I wonder why it isn't > support by libata? Is there something in your git-tree? Or what are the > reasons/problems behind that libata is missing NCQ support for (CK804) > SATAII? Ask NVIDIA. They are the only company that gives me -zero- information on their SATA controllers. As such, there are -zero- plans for NCQ on NVIDIA controllers at this time. Jeff