From: Mike Waychison <mikew@google.com>
To: YhLu <YhLu@tyan.com>
Cc: Peter Buckingham <peter@pantasys.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"'discuss@x86-64.org'" <discuss@x86-64.org>
Subject: Re: 2.6.13-rc2 with dual way dual core ck804 MB
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 16:14:19 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <42FA8A4B.4090408@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3174569B9743D511922F00A0C94314230AF97867@TYANWEB>
YhLu wrote:
> andi,
>
> please refer the patch, it will move cpu_set(, cpu_callin_map) from
> smi_callin to start_secondary.
This patch fixes an apparent race / lockup on our 2-way dual cores (when
applied against 2.6.12.3). The machine was locking up after
"Initializing CPU#2".
Mike Waychison
>
> --- /home/yhlu/xx1/linux-2.6.13-rc2/arch/x86_64/kernel/smpboot.c.orig
> 2005-07-06 18:41:16.789767168 -0700
> +++ /home/yhlu/xx1/linux-2.6.13-rc2/arch/x86_64/kernel/smpboot.c
> 2005-07-06 18:45:11.923021480 -0700
> @@ -442,7 +442,7 @@
> /*
> * Allow the master to continue.
> */
> - cpu_set(cpuid, cpu_callin_map);
> +// cpu_set(cpuid, cpu_callin_map); // moved to start_secondary by yhlu
> }
>
> static inline void set_cpu_sibling_map(int cpu)
> @@ -529,8 +529,11 @@
> /* Wait for TSC sync to not schedule things before.
> We still process interrupts, which could see an inconsistent
> time in that window unfortunately. */
> +
> tsc_sync_wait();
>
> + cpu_set(smp_processor_id(), cpu_callin_map); // moved from
> smp_callin by yhlu
> +
> cpu_idle();
> }
>
> the other solution will be change cpu_callin_map to cpu_online_map in
> do_boot_cpu
>
> /*
> * allow APs to start initializing.
> */
> Dprintk("Before Callout %d.\n", cpu);
> cpu_set(cpu, cpu_callout_map);
> Dprintk("After Callout %d.\n", cpu);
>
> /*
> * Wait 5s total for a response
> */
> for (timeout = 0; timeout < 50000; timeout++) {
> if (cpu_isset(cpu, cpu_callin_map))
> --------------------------> cpu_online_map
> break; /* It has booted */
> udelay(100);
> }
>
> if (cpu_isset(cpu, cpu_callin_map)) {
> --------------------------------> cpu_online_map
> /* number CPUs logically, starting from 1 (BSP is 0)
> */
> Dprintk("CPU has booted.\n");
> } else {
> boot_error = 1;
> if (*((volatile unsigned char
> *)phys_to_virt(SMP_TRAMPOLINE_BASE))
> == 0xA5)
> /* trampoline started but...? */
> printk("Stuck ??\n");
> else
> /* trampoline code not run */
> printk("Not responding.\n");
> #if APIC_DEBUG
> inquire_remote_apic(apicid);
> #endif
> }
>
>
> the result will be
>
> Booting processor 1/1 rip 6000 rsp ffff81013ff89f58
> Initializing CPU#1
> masked ExtINT on CPU#1
> Calibrating delay using timer specific routine.. 4422.98 BogoMIPS
> (lpj=8845965)
> CPU: L1 I Cache: 64K (64 bytes/line), D cache 64K (64 bytes/line)
> CPU: L2 Cache: 1024K (64 bytes/line)
> CPU 1(2) -> Node 0 -> Core 1
> stepping 00
> CPU 1: Syncing TSC to CPU 0.
> sync_master: 1 smp_processor_id() = 00, boot_cpu_id= 00
> sync_master: 2 smp_processor_id() = 00, boot_cpu_id= 00
> CPU 1: synchronized TSC with CPU 0 (last diff 0 cycles, maxerr 595 cycles)
> ---------------------> it is in right place.
> Booting processor 2/2 rip 6000 rsp ffff81023ff1df58
> Initializing CPU#2
> masked ExtINT on CPU#2
> Calibrating delay using timer specific routine.. 4422.99 BogoMIPS
> (lpj=8845997)
> CPU: L1 I Cache: 64K (64 bytes/line), D cache 64K (64 bytes/line)
> CPU: L2 Cache: 1024K (64 bytes/line)
> CPU 2(2) -> Node 1 -> Core 0
> stepping 00
> CPU 2: Syncing TSC to CPU 0.
> sync_master: 1 smp_processor_id() = 00, boot_cpu_id= 00
> sync_master: 1 smp_processor_id() = 01, boot_cpu_id= 00
> sync_master: 2 smp_processor_id() = 00, boot_cpu_id= 00
> CPU 2: synchronized TSC with CPU 0 (last diff -4 cycles, maxerr 1097 cycles)
> Booting processor 3/3 rip 6000 rsp ffff81013ff53f58
> Initializing CPU#3
> masked ExtINT on CPU#3
> Calibrating delay using timer specific routine.. 4423.03 BogoMIPS
> (lpj=8846075)
> CPU: L1 I Cache: 64K (64 bytes/line), D cache 64K (64 bytes/line)
> CPU: L2 Cache: 1024K (64 bytes/line)
> CPU 3(2) -> Node 1 -> Core 1
> stepping 00
> CPU 3: Syncing TSC to CPU 0.
> sync_master: 1 smp_processor_id() = 00, boot_cpu_id= 00
> sync_master: 1 smp_processor_id() = 01, boot_cpu_id= 00
> sync_master: 1 smp_processor_id() = 02, boot_cpu_id= 00
> sync_master: 2 smp_processor_id() = 00, boot_cpu_id= 00
> CPU 3: synchronized TSC with CPU 0 (last diff -4 cycles, maxerr 1097 cycles)
> Brought up 4 CPUs
>
>
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: YhLu
>>Sent: Wednesday, July 06, 2005 3:25 PM
>>To: Andi Kleen
>>Cc: Peter Buckingham; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
>>Subject: 2.6.13-rc2 with dual way dual core ck804 MB
>>
>>andi,
>>
>>the core1/node0 take a long while to get TSC synchronized. Is
>>it normal?
>>i guess
>>"CPU 1: synchronized TSC with CPU 0" should be just after
>>"CPU 1: Syncing TSC to CPU0"
>>
>>YH
>>
>>
>>cpu 1: setting up apic clock
>>cpu 1: enabling apic timer
>>CPU 1: Syncing TSC to CPU 0.
>>CPU has booted.
>>waiting for cpu 1
>>
>>cpu 2: setting up apic clock
>>cpu 2: enabling apic timer
>>CPU 2: Syncing TSC to CPU 0.
>>CPU 2: synchronized TSC with CPU 0 (last diff -4 cycles,
>>maxerr 1097 cycles) CPU has booted.
>>waiting for cpu 2
>>
>>cpu 3: setting up apic clock
>>cpu 3: enabling apic timer
>>CPU 3: Syncing TSC to CPU 0.
>>CPU 3: synchronized TSC with CPU 0 (last diff 1 cycles,
>>maxerr 1087 cycles) CPU has booted.
>>waiting for cpu 3
>>
>>testing NMI watchdog ... CPU#1: NMI appears to be stuck (1->1)!
>>checking if image is initramfs...<6>CPU 1: synchronized TSC
>>with CPU 0 (last diff 0 cycles, maxerr 595 cycles) it isn't
>>(no cpio magic); looks like an initrd
>>
>>
>>the
>>-
>>To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
>>linux-kernel" in the body of a message to
>>majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at
>>http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-08-10 23:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-07-07 0:56 2.6.13-rc2 with dual way dual core ck804 MB YhLu
2005-08-10 23:14 ` Mike Waychison [this message]
2005-08-10 23:26 ` [discuss] " Andi Kleen
2005-08-10 23:42 ` yhlu
2005-08-11 0:04 ` Andi Kleen
2005-08-11 0:17 ` yhlu
2005-08-11 0:23 ` yhlu
2005-08-11 0:28 ` Andi Kleen
2005-08-11 0:43 ` yhlu
2005-08-11 0:51 ` Andi Kleen
2005-08-12 6:59 ` yhlu
2005-08-12 7:04 ` yhlu
2005-08-12 13:07 ` Andi Kleen
2005-08-12 16:18 ` yhlu
2005-08-12 16:41 ` Andi Kleen
2005-08-12 17:36 ` yhlu
2005-08-10 23:49 ` Mike Waychison
2005-08-10 23:31 ` Peter Buckingham
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-07-07 17:50 YhLu
2005-07-06 22:25 YhLu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=42FA8A4B.4090408@google.com \
--to=mikew@google.com \
--cc=YhLu@tyan.com \
--cc=discuss@x86-64.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peter@pantasys.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox