From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751039AbVHKQcZ (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Aug 2005 12:32:25 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751103AbVHKQcZ (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Aug 2005 12:32:25 -0400 Received: from zproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.162.198]:44821 "EHLO zproxy.gmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751039AbVHKQcY (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Aug 2005 12:32:24 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:user-agent:x-accept-language:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:from; b=C5Qe7oGR7O30AXlQZH1J5ny32mSBOF6/CBeNQPnMvU7+sTX7qKlm/Tg4/zGVt2uC8+xJ0IVUCyBEVc9voPXarwySz3pBZrzcsbfFYyqTIZGD+6Y2F+afeVQtCcMq9WM1lD/+eZcP6ZE3/CgwGr07ybkJrWhmnY5Yjcm/lZ8UNhA= Message-ID: <42FB7D87.90308@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2005 18:32:07 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (X11/20050808) X-Accept-Language: de-DE, de, en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Roger Heflin CC: "'Lee Revell'" , lgb@lgb.hu, "'Allen Martin'" , "'linux mailing-list'" Subject: Re: NCQ support NVidia NForce4 (CK804) SATAII References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Michael Thonke Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Roger Heflin schrieb: >For high end stuff Serverworks is supposed to have some >AMD stuff soon (this is rumor I heard). > > If there where some pieces for desktop from AMD orignially I would take them..but they don't offer...that's the point...to cry. Like Intel offer ..Intel CPU + Intel Chipset best combination overall ATM. >>>From what Allen said, the implication to me is that something >in the current NVIDIA stat NCQ chipset is *not* fully under >NVIDIA's control, > What the sell hardware they can't support or develop driver for it.. okay that's the point why many windows users complain about Data corruption. Thanks for raising this point. > ie they got some piece of technology from >someone else and cannot disclose its details, which would be >why the could release a "clean" redesigned one. > > Roger > > > A bit late or not? What we have done to get this punishment? I love Linux and I won't move from it because of it...loyality :-) -- Michael Thonke IT-Systemintegrator / System- and Softwareanalyist