From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751252AbVHLTRj (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Aug 2005 15:17:39 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751253AbVHLTRj (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Aug 2005 15:17:39 -0400 Received: from pfepc.post.tele.dk ([195.41.46.237]:39192 "EHLO pfepc.post.tele.dk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751251AbVHLTRi (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Aug 2005 15:17:38 -0400 Message-ID: <42FCF5D3.1080409@danbbs.dk> Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2005 21:17:39 +0200 From: Mogens Valentin Reply-To: monz@danbbs.dk Organization: Mr Dev User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jeff Garzik CC: Linux IDE Mailing List , Linux Kernel , SCSI Mailing List Subject: Re: SATA status report updated References: <42FC2EF8.7030404@pobox.com> In-Reply-To: <42FC2EF8.7030404@pobox.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Jeff Garzik wrote: > > Things in SATA-land have been moving along recently, so I updated the > software status report: > > http://linux.yyz.us/sata/software-status.html >> Queueing support, NCQ: >> #3 will be supported by libata, for all hardware and devices that >> support NCQ. I guess this means libata support for HW-based NCQ. It also could mean software/driver implemented NCQ, which could work on chipsets not supporting HW-NCQ in unison with a disk having NCQ? > Although I have not updated it in several weeks, folks may wish to refer > to the hardware status report as well: > > http://linux.yyz.us/sata/sata-status.html How well does libata work with the newest ULi chipsets? If not well, is there a possible timeframe? (not on kernel list; if anyone there comments on ULi, pls. cc private) -- Kind regards, Mogens Valentin