From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750903AbVHLVad (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Aug 2005 17:30:33 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750906AbVHLVad (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Aug 2005 17:30:33 -0400 Received: from mail.dvmed.net ([216.237.124.58]:10157 "EHLO mail.dvmed.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750901AbVHLVac (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Aug 2005 17:30:32 -0400 Message-ID: <42FD14F0.5030500@pobox.com> Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2005 17:30:24 -0400 From: Jeff Garzik User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6-1.1.fc4 (X11/20050720) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Brett Russ CC: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Greg KH Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.12.3] PCI/libata INTx cleanup References: <20050803204709.8BA0720B06@lns1058.lss.emc.com> <42FBA08C.5040103@pobox.com> <20050812171043.CF61020E8B@lns1058.lss.emc.com> In-Reply-To: <20050812171043.CF61020E8B@lns1058.lss.emc.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Brett Russ wrote: > Jeff Garzik wrote: >>Though there is nothing wrong with this patch, I would prefer a single >>function, pci_intx(), as found in drivers/scsi/ahci.c. > Sounds like what I did, except for the naming change. I did away with > pci_disable_intx() and changed the names. Look ok? Nope. Ahhhhh. You were looking at an older kernel.Nope. Read the implementation I referenced, in ahci.c, from 2.6.13-rc6. It takes a second argument: static void pci_intx(struct pci_dev *pdev, int enable) Regards, Jeff