From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932187AbVHMQll (ORCPT ); Sat, 13 Aug 2005 12:41:41 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932194AbVHMQll (ORCPT ); Sat, 13 Aug 2005 12:41:41 -0400 Received: from mail.dvmed.net ([216.237.124.58]:37808 "EHLO mail.dvmed.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932187AbVHMQlk (ORCPT ); Sat, 13 Aug 2005 12:41:40 -0400 Message-ID: <42FE22BD.3050804@pobox.com> Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2005 12:41:33 -0400 From: Jeff Garzik User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6-1.1.fc4 (X11/20050720) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Grant Coady CC: Karsten Wiese , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: [PATCH,RFC] quirks for VIA VT8237 southbridge References: <200508131710.38569.annabellesgarden@yahoo.de> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Grant Coady wrote: > I'm tracking a dataloss on box with this chip, finding it difficult > to nail a configuration that reliably produces dataloss, sometimes > only one bit (e.g. 'c' --> 'C') of unpacking kernel source tree gets > changed. I've been watching this thread in the background. Just to eliminate one possibility, I would definitely switch out SATA cables, which are notoriously crappy. Jeff