public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>
Cc: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>, bpf <bpf@vger.kernel.org>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
	Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>,
	Song Liu <song@kernel.org>,
	John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
	KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>,
	Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>, Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Kernel Team <kernel-team@meta.com>,
	kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next] bpf: Disable -Wmissing-declarations for globally-linked kfuncs
Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2023 23:08:29 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <42d6b829-ab97-2b81-de2c-7551da13f913@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAADnVQKtWkPWMG+F-Tkf3YXeMnC=Xwi8GA5xJMaqi725tgHSTw@mail.gmail.com>



On 8/16/23 8:48 PM, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 16, 2023 at 8:38 PM Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 8/16/23 8:06 AM, David Vernet wrote:
>>> We recently got an lkp warning about missing declarations, as in e.g.
>>> [0]. This warning is largely redundant with -Wmissing-prototypes, which
>>> we already disable for kfuncs that have global linkage and are meant to
>>> be exported in BTF, and called from BPF programs. Let's also disable
>>> -Wmissing-declarations for kfuncs. For what it's worth, I wasn't able to
>>> reproduce the warning even on W <= 3, so I can't actually be 100% sure
>>> this fixes the issue.
>>>
>>> [0]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/202308162115.Hn23vv3n-lkp@intel.com/
>>
>> Okay, I just got a similar email to [0] which complains
>>     bpf_obj_new_impl, ..., bpf_cast_to_kern_ctx
>> missing declarations.
>>
>> In the email, the used compiler is
>> compiler: gcc-7 (Ubuntu 7.5.0-6ubuntu2) 7.5.0
>>
>> Unfortunately, I did not have gcc-7 to verify this.
>> Also, what is the minimum gcc version kernel supports? 5.1?
> 
> pahole and BTF might be broken in such old GCC too.
> Maybe we should add:
> config BPF_SYSCALL
>          depends on GCC_VERSION >= 90000 || CLANG_VERSION >= 130000

Do you remember what kind of issues pahole/BTF have for
< 9.0 gcc and < 13.0 clang?


      parent reply	other threads:[~2023-08-17  6:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-08-16 15:06 [PATCH bpf-next] bpf: Disable -Wmissing-declarations for globally-linked kfuncs David Vernet
2023-08-17  3:38 ` Yonghong Song
2023-08-17  3:48   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2023-08-17  4:01     ` David Vernet
2023-08-17 14:35       ` Daniel Borkmann
2023-08-17 14:45         ` Anton Protopopov
2023-08-17  6:08     ` Yonghong Song [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=42d6b829-ab97-2b81-de2c-7551da13f913@linux.dev \
    --to=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    --cc=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=haoluo@google.com \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
    --cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lkp@intel.com \
    --cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=sdf@google.com \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    --cc=void@manifault.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox