From: George Anzinger <george@mvista.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com>,
Ryan Brown <some.nzguy@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@us.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.13-rc4-V0.7.53-01, High Resolution Timers & RCU-tasklist features
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2005 16:39:56 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <430127CC.5080102@mvista.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050815062934.GA5915@elte.hu>
Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote:
>
>
>>* George Anzinger <george@mvista.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Ingo, all
>>>
>>>I, silly person that I am, configured an RT, SMP, PREEMPT_DEBUG system.
>>> Someone put code in the NMI path to modify the preempt count which,
>>>often as not will generate a PREEMPT_DEBUG message as there is no tell
>>>what state the preempt count is in on an NMI interrupt. I have sent
>>>the attached patch to Andrew on this, but meanwhile, if you want RT,
>>>SMP, PREEMPT_DEBUG you will be much better off with this.
>>
>>ah - thanks, applied. Might explain some of the recent SMP weirdnesses
>>i'm seeing. Attributed them to the HRT patch ;-)
>
>
> i'm still seeing weird crashes under SMP, which go away if i disable
> CONFIG_HIGH_RES_TIMERS. (this after i fixed a couple of other SMP bugs
> in the HRT code) It happens sometime during the bootup, after enabling
> the network but before users can log in. There's no good debug info,
> just a hang that comes from all CPUs trying to get some debug info out
> but crashing deeply.
>
I haven't looked at this new code all that closely as yet. One thing I
did notice is that there is an assumption that the "timer being
delivered flag" can be shared between LR timers and HR timers. I
suspect this is wrong as the delivery code is in seperate threads (I
assume). This could lead to del_timer_async missing a timer.
In the prior patch we just ignored the del_timer_async issue for HR
timers (code I plan to do soon). This WAS taken care of in earlier
kernels by a reuse of one of the list link fields, but Andrew convince
me that this was _not_ good.
So, my guess, a nanosleep for an RT task (I think you said these are
promoted to HR) is completing and over writing the deliver in progress
flag for a LR timer which just happens to have a del_timer_sync going on
at the same time.
--
George Anzinger george@mvista.com
HRT (High-res-timers): http://sourceforge.net/projects/high-res-timers/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-08-15 23:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-08-11 11:00 [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.13-rc4-V0.7.53-01, High Resolution Timers & RCU-tasklist features Ingo Molnar
2005-08-12 3:07 ` Lee Revell
2005-08-12 3:19 ` Lee Revell
2005-08-12 7:03 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-08-12 7:48 ` Thomas Gleixner
2005-08-12 7:07 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-08-13 0:28 ` Ryan Brown
2005-08-13 0:32 ` Lee Revell
2005-08-13 0:57 ` George Anzinger
2005-08-14 2:12 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-08-15 6:29 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-08-15 23:39 ` George Anzinger [this message]
2005-08-16 6:36 ` Thomas Gleixner
2005-08-15 11:18 ` [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.13-rc6-V0.7.53-11 Ingo Molnar
2005-08-15 20:35 ` Peter Zijlstra
2005-08-16 3:53 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-08-16 14:35 ` Alan Stern
2005-08-16 16:12 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-08-16 16:56 ` Alan Stern
2005-08-16 17:02 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-08-17 2:23 ` David Brownell
2005-08-17 14:10 ` Alan Stern
2005-08-17 20:51 ` David Brownell
2005-08-18 4:52 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-08-18 6:37 ` David Brownell
2005-08-18 14:43 ` Alan Stern
2005-08-22 11:07 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-08-17 6:31 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-08-16 8:41 ` 2.6.13-rc6-rt1 Ingo Molnar
2005-08-16 12:32 ` 2.6.13-rc6-rt1 Michal Schmidt
2005-08-27 1:15 ` 2.6.13-rc6-rt1 Matt Mackall
2005-08-29 22:36 ` 2.6.13-rc6-rt1 Esben Nielsen
2005-08-17 0:53 ` [patch] KGDB for Real-Time Preemption systems George Anzinger
2005-08-17 6:53 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-08-17 19:16 ` George Anzinger
2005-09-05 12:23 ` Serge Noiraud
2005-09-08 0:37 ` George Anzinger
2005-09-07 8:55 ` Serge Noiraud
2005-09-07 21:16 ` George Anzinger
2005-09-08 8:57 ` Serge Noiraud
2005-09-08 20:47 ` George Anzinger
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-08-11 18:39 [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.13-rc4-V0.7.53-01, High Resolution Timers & RCU-tasklist features Guillaume Foliard
2005-08-12 12:53 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-08-12 19:27 ` Guillaume Foliard
2005-08-12 19:47 ` Guillaume Foliard
2005-08-12 20:07 ` Chuck Harding
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=430127CC.5080102@mvista.com \
--to=george@mvista.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=paulmck@us.ibm.com \
--cc=rlrevell@joe-job.com \
--cc=some.nzguy@gmail.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox