From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753550AbaENJ3Z (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 May 2014 05:29:25 -0400 Received: from mout.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.130]:58892 "EHLO mout.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751055AbaENJ3V (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 May 2014 05:29:21 -0400 From: Arnd Bergmann To: Paul Bolle Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Russell King , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] [RESEND] ARM: remove last use of CONFIG_CPU_ARM710 Date: Wed, 14 May 2014 11:28:50 +0200 Message-ID: <4305975.PvMXZQ020k@wuerfel> User-Agent: KMail/4.11.5 (Linux/3.11.0-18-generic; KDE/4.11.5; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <1400059550.31197.12.camel@x220> References: <1364507176.1345.45.camel@x61.thuisdomein> <8309592.drxAj71PnZ@wuerfel> <1400059550.31197.12.camel@x220> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:ocoF5D9tC4XDF88EymEK9AIXpOJ8Pd//OPo+G7yXwdq cvtHJoYLwrlkEPLcc/cdfNdtXX3aYCrNt8ncfBqYjngf5mjUAO z2msGVheTstsTOpvAL1TLctjPihMtMk6mHOcLk0Vh9Lrl0n3Ii 29B+caVBzPwPXniyNu4WdquDUK6HSnKfuHEA9BzPVRqLD6HLlv r0kAPHBFJ1+T691BEw//bDRowvG0Blaz0npUKMZM52fcui7oOS AY8lb1Kd1fXyjW+9Wy6xKEUWZoj20Gq2v8xl5/04FROk9cEesw YMI4uCbas7+sDxNZ1IFa0RSffFKFzzbyk1xW6Nzvq2+TM/twUZ Rk+Q70JaeJb1C7wvQG+w= Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wednesday 14 May 2014 11:25:50 Paul Bolle wrote: > On Wed, 2014-05-14 at 11:17 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > 'git grep -i arm710' tells me that there is also some arm710 > > specific code in arch/arm/mm/proc-arm720.S that we may want to > > remove along with this. > > > > The DT binding should probably remain untouched though, I think it's > > correct to document the string. > > That seems to be cpu_arm710_name, __arm710_setup, and everything called > by __arm710_setup. Cleaning that up (as a separate patch) appears to be > trivial. If I do that it would be (sort of educated) guesswork. But I > don't mind doing it. What do you prefer? I think that would be great. For the first patch, please add Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann Once the second patch is reviewed, please add them both to Russell's patch tracker. Arnd