From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751197AbVHUVoj (ORCPT ); Sun, 21 Aug 2005 17:44:39 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751195AbVHUVoi (ORCPT ); Sun, 21 Aug 2005 17:44:38 -0400 Received: from zeus1.kernel.org ([204.152.191.4]:6606 "EHLO zeus1.kernel.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751187AbVHUVoi (ORCPT ); Sun, 21 Aug 2005 17:44:38 -0400 Message-ID: <4308AD9D.5090003@trash.net> Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2005 18:36:45 +0200 From: Patrick McHardy User-Agent: Debian Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050602) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: danial_thom@yahoo.com CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.6.12 Performance problems References: <20050821161805.74083.qmail@web33309.mail.mud.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20050821161805.74083.qmail@web33309.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Danial Thom wrote: > --- Patrick McHardy wrote: > >>Do you have netfilter enabled? Briging >>netfilter was >>added in 2.6, enabling it will influence >>performance >>negatively. Otherwise, is this performance drop >>visible in other setups besides bridging as >>well? > > Yes, bridging is clean. I also routed with the > same performance drop. In that case please send more information, like both 2.4 and 2.6 configs, dmesg output from booting, lspci output, other hardware details, ..