public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Davy Durham <pubaddr2@davyandbeth.com>
To: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org>
Cc: Willy Tarreau <willy@w.ods.org>,
	bert hubert <bert.hubert@netherlabs.nl>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: select() efficiency / epoll
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2005 12:08:18 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <430B5802.5050200@davyandbeth.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.63.0508231618420.7257@localhost.localdomain>

Davide Libenzi wrote:

>
> I should mention that the 2.4 patch is old WRT mainline epoll in 2.6 
> (I stopped maintaining it when 2.6 went "stable"). I'd definitely 
> suggest to use 2.6 if you are looking at epoll.
>
I am using linux-2.6.11 and glibc-2.3.4  .. and using select() in it's 
place seems to work fine.  Are there any known issues with say, one 
thread does epoll_wait()s while other threads may be doing epoll_ctl()s?

Is there someone else I should be asking this question?

Thanks,
  Davy

  reply	other threads:[~2005-08-24  1:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-07-22 21:18 select() efficiency Davy Durham
2005-07-22 21:24 ` bert hubert
2005-08-23  9:49   ` select() efficiency / epoll Davy Durham
2005-08-23 18:24     ` bert hubert
2005-08-23 11:01       ` Davy Durham
2005-08-23 11:25         ` Davy Durham
2005-08-23 19:12         ` Willy Tarreau
2005-08-23 11:24           ` Davy Durham
2005-08-23 19:45             ` Willy Tarreau
2005-08-23 11:55               ` Davy Durham
2005-08-23 20:20                 ` Willy Tarreau
2005-08-23 23:21                   ` Davide Libenzi
2005-08-23 17:08                     ` Davy Durham [this message]
2005-08-24  5:09                       ` Davide Libenzi
2005-08-23 22:35                         ` Davy Durham
2005-08-23 19:30     ` Jari Sundell
2005-08-23 11:53       ` Davy Durham
2005-08-23 20:42         ` Jari Sundell
2005-08-23 17:11           ` Davy Durham
2005-08-23 17:40           ` Davy Durham

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=430B5802.5050200@davyandbeth.com \
    --to=pubaddr2@davyandbeth.com \
    --cc=bert.hubert@netherlabs.nl \
    --cc=davidel@xmailserver.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=willy@w.ods.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox