From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750704AbVHXBGg (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Aug 2005 21:06:36 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750785AbVHXBGg (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Aug 2005 21:06:36 -0400 Received: from intranet.networkstreaming.com ([24.227.179.66]:44732 "EHLO networkstreaming.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750704AbVHXBGg (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Aug 2005 21:06:36 -0400 Message-ID: <430B5802.5050200@davyandbeth.com> Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2005 12:08:18 -0500 From: Davy Durham User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.6) Gecko/20050322 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Davide Libenzi CC: Willy Tarreau , bert hubert , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: select() efficiency / epoll References: <42E162B6.2000602@davyandbeth.com> <20050722212454.GB18988@outpost.ds9a.nl> <430AF11A.5000303@davyandbeth.com> <20050823182405.GA21301@outpost.ds9a.nl> <430B01FB.2070903@davyandbeth.com> <20050823191254.GB10110@alpha.home.local> <430B077A.10700@davyandbeth.com> <20050823194557.GC10110@alpha.home.local> <430B0EAE.9080504@davyandbeth.com> <20050823202018.GA28724@alpha.home.local> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 24 Aug 2005 01:06:11.0875 (UTC) FILETIME=[04A1C730:01C5A848] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Davide Libenzi wrote: > > I should mention that the 2.4 patch is old WRT mainline epoll in 2.6 > (I stopped maintaining it when 2.6 went "stable"). I'd definitely > suggest to use 2.6 if you are looking at epoll. > I am using linux-2.6.11 and glibc-2.3.4 .. and using select() in it's place seems to work fine. Are there any known issues with say, one thread does epoll_wait()s while other threads may be doing epoll_ctl()s? Is there someone else I should be asking this question? Thanks, Davy