From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
To: danial_thom@yahoo.com
Cc: Sven-Thorsten Dietrich <sven@mvista.com>,
Helge Hafting <helge.hafting@aitel.hist.no>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.12 Performance problems
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2005 22:40:30 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <430B89BE.1020600@trash.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050823201004.77101.qmail@web33310.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Danial Thom wrote:
> None of this is helpful, but since no one has
> been able to tell me how to tune it to provide
> absolute priority to the network stack I'll
> assume it can't be done.
The network stack already has priority over user processes,
except when executed in process context, so preemption has
no direct impact on briding or routing performance.
The reason why noone answered your question is because you
don't ask but claim or assume.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-08-23 20:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-08-21 16:57 2.6.12 Performance problems Danial Thom
2005-08-23 7:12 ` Helge Hafting
2005-08-23 17:10 ` Danial Thom
2005-08-23 17:21 ` Patrick McHardy
2005-08-24 16:24 ` Danial Thom
2005-08-24 16:35 ` Jesper Juhl
2005-08-24 17:26 ` Danial Thom
2005-08-25 4:51 ` Ben Greear
2005-08-25 6:08 ` Danial Thom
2005-08-25 6:15 ` Ben Greear
2005-08-26 3:29 ` Danial Thom
2005-08-26 22:18 ` Danial Thom
2005-08-25 6:34 ` Ben Greear
2005-08-25 14:26 ` Danial Thom
2005-08-25 16:55 ` Ben Greear
2005-08-25 20:45 ` Danial Thom
2005-08-26 19:10 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2005-08-27 11:19 ` Vladimir B. Savkin
2005-08-27 14:35 ` Danial Thom
2005-08-23 18:02 ` Sven-Thorsten Dietrich
2005-08-23 20:10 ` Danial Thom
2005-08-23 20:22 ` Sven-Thorsten Dietrich
2005-08-24 16:33 ` Danial Thom
2005-08-23 20:40 ` Patrick McHardy [this message]
2005-08-23 23:29 ` Ben Greear
2005-08-24 16:39 ` Danial Thom
2005-08-23 21:32 ` Jesper Juhl
2005-08-24 17:03 ` Danial Thom
[not found] <2230.192.167.206.189.1124721719.squirrel@new.host.name>
2005-08-22 15:41 ` Danial Thom
2005-08-26 13:17 ` Adrian Bunk
2005-08-26 15:34 ` Danial Thom
2005-08-26 16:21 ` Adrian Bunk
2005-08-26 17:06 ` Danial Thom
2005-08-26 18:30 ` Adrian Bunk
2005-08-26 21:09 ` Danial Thom
2005-08-26 23:27 ` Ben Greear
2005-08-27 14:44 ` Danial Thom
[not found] <9a87484905082111205d27c1aa@mail.gmail.com>
2005-08-21 20:21 ` Danial Thom
2005-08-21 21:21 ` Jesper Juhl
2005-08-22 11:46 ` Denis Vlasenko
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-08-21 17:07 Danial Thom
2005-08-21 15:46 Danial Thom
2005-08-21 16:15 ` Patrick McHardy
2005-08-21 16:18 ` Danial Thom
2005-08-21 16:36 ` Patrick McHardy
2005-08-21 19:47 ` Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=430B89BE.1020600@trash.net \
--to=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=danial_thom@yahoo.com \
--cc=helge.hafting@aitel.hist.no \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sven@mvista.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox