From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932333AbVHaBww (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Aug 2005 21:52:52 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932331AbVHaBww (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Aug 2005 21:52:52 -0400 Received: from mail.dvmed.net ([216.237.124.58]:41676 "EHLO mail.dvmed.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932330AbVHaBwv (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Aug 2005 21:52:51 -0400 Message-ID: <43150D64.1060208@pobox.com> Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2005 21:52:36 -0400 From: Jeff Garzik User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6-1.1.fc4 (X11/20050720) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mark Lord CC: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] libata: add ATAPI module option References: <20050830215234.GA6991@havoc.gtf.org> <4314F1C8.8040706@rtr.ca> In-Reply-To: <4314F1C8.8040706@rtr.ca> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Mark Lord wrote: > Jeff Garzik wrote: > >> >> -#ifndef ATA_ENABLE_ATAPI >> - if (unlikely(dev->class == ATA_DEV_ATAPI)) >> - return NULL; >> -#endif >> + if (atapi_enabled) { >> + if (unlikely(dev->class == ATA_DEV_ATAPI)) >> + return NULL; >> + } > > .. > > Is that if-stmt the right way around? > At first glance, I'd expect it to read: > > if (!atapi_enabled) { > ... > > Cheers! Indeed, thanks, fixed. Jeff