From: Brian King <brking@us.ibm.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] block: CFQ refcounting fix
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2005 08:57:33 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4315B74D.8020100@us.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050831134259.GW4018@suse.de>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1538 bytes --]
Jens Axboe wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 31 2005, Brian King wrote:
>
>>Jens Axboe wrote:
>>
>>>On Tue, Aug 30 2005, brking@us.ibm.com wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>I ran across a memory leak related to the cfq scheduler. The cfq
>>>>init function increments the refcnt of the associated request_queue.
>>>>This refcount gets decremented in cfq's exit function. Since blk_cleanup_queue
>>>>only calls the elevator exit function when its refcnt goes to zero, the
>>>>request_q never gets cleaned up. It didn't look like other io schedulers were
>>>>incrementing this refcnt, so I removed the refcnt increment and it fixed the
>>>>memory leak for me.
>>>>
>>>>To reproduce the problem, simply use cfq and use the scsi_host scan sysfs
>>>>attribute to scan "- - -" repeatedly on a scsi host and watch the memory
>>>>vanish.
>>>
>>>
>>>Yeah, that actually looks like a dangling reference. I assume you tested
>>>this properly?
>>
>>Yes. I applied the patch, booted my system (which was crashing on
>>bootup before due to out of memory errors due to the leak) ran the
>>scan a few times and verified /proc/meminfo didn't continually
>>decrease like without it, and rebooted again. If there is anything
>>else you would like me to do, I would be happy to do so.
>
>
> I think you need to remove the blk_put_queue() in cfq_put_cfqd() as
> well, otherwise I don't see how this can work without looking at freed
> memory. I'll audit the other paths as well.
Good catch. Here is an updated patch.
--
Brian King
eServer Storage I/O
IBM Linux Technology Center
[-- Attachment #2: cfq_refcnt_fix.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 1442 bytes --]
I ran across a memory leak related to the cfq scheduler. The cfq
init function increments the refcnt of the associated request_queue.
This refcount gets decremented in cfq's exit function. Since blk_cleanup_queue
only calls the elevator exit function when its refcnt goes to zero, the
request_q never gets cleaned up. It didn't look like other io schedulers were
incrementing this refcnt, so I removed the refcnt increment and it fixed the
memory leak for me.
To reproduce the problem, simply use cfq and use the scsi_host scan sysfs
attribute to scan "- - -" repeatedly on a scsi host and watch the memory
vanish.
Signed-off-by: Brian King <brking@us.ibm.com>
---
linux-2.6-bjking1/drivers/block/cfq-iosched.c | 3 ---
1 files changed, 3 deletions(-)
diff -puN drivers/block/cfq-iosched.c~cfq_refcnt_fix drivers/block/cfq-iosched.c
--- linux-2.6/drivers/block/cfq-iosched.c~cfq_refcnt_fix 2005-08-30 17:26:55.000000000 -0500
+++ linux-2.6-bjking1/drivers/block/cfq-iosched.c 2005-08-31 08:48:30.000000000 -0500
@@ -2260,8 +2260,6 @@ static void cfq_put_cfqd(struct cfq_data
if (!atomic_dec_and_test(&cfqd->ref))
return;
- blk_put_queue(q);
-
cfq_shutdown_timer_wq(cfqd);
q->elevator->elevator_data = NULL;
@@ -2318,7 +2316,6 @@ static int cfq_init_queue(request_queue_
e->elevator_data = cfqd;
cfqd->queue = q;
- atomic_inc(&q->refcnt);
cfqd->max_queued = q->nr_requests / 4;
q->nr_batching = cfq_queued;
_
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-08-31 13:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-08-30 22:41 [PATCH 1/1] block: CFQ refcounting fix brking
2005-08-31 7:28 ` Jens Axboe
2005-08-31 13:40 ` Brian King
2005-08-31 13:43 ` Jens Axboe
2005-08-31 13:57 ` Brian King [this message]
2005-08-31 15:50 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4315B74D.8020100@us.ibm.com \
--to=brking@us.ibm.com \
--cc=axboe@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox