From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org-S964856AbVHaSuF@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S964856AbVHaSuF (ORCPT <rfc822;willy@w.ods.org>);
	Wed, 31 Aug 2005 14:50:05 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S964857AbVHaSuF
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Wed, 31 Aug 2005 14:50:05 -0400
Received: from pne-smtpout2-sn2.hy.skanova.net ([81.228.8.164]:1277 "EHLO
	pne-smtpout2-sn2.hy.skanova.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S964856AbVHaSuE (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 31 Aug 2005 14:50:04 -0400
Message-ID: <4315FBC7.50805@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2005 20:49:43 +0200
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Erik_Andr=E9n?= <erik.andren@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050317)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Updated dynamic tick patches
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Great job Srivatsa,
Does these patches compile nicely against 2.6.13?
Otherwise would it be possible for you to repost patches made against 
2.6.13 instead for more public testing?

With best regards
Erik Andrén