public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>
To: john stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>
Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] Use proper casting with signed timespec.tv_nsec values
Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2005 23:37:34 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4317749E.3020109@cosmosbay.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1125608627.22448.4.camel@cog.beaverton.ibm.com>

john stultz a écrit :
> All,
> 	I recently ran into a bug with an older kernel where xtime's tv_nsec
> field had accumulated more then 2 seconds worth of time. The timespec's
> tv_nsec is a signed long, however gettimeofday() treats it as an
> unsigned long. Thus when the failure occured, very strange and difficult
> to debug time problems occurred.
> 
> The main cause of the problem I was seeing is already fixed in mainline,
> however just to be safe, I figured the following patch would be wise.
> 
> I only audited i386 and x86_64, however other arches probably could have
> similar signed problems as well.
> 
> Please let me know if you have any further comments or feedback.

What happens on i386 when/if more than 4 seconds accumulate ?
That should happens too.
Maybe the real fix is elsewhere ?

> 
> thanks
> -john
> 
> linux-2.6.13_signed-tv_nsec_A0.patch
> ====================================
> --- a/kernel/timer.c
> +++ b/kernel/timer.c
> @@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ static void update_wall_time(unsigned lo
>  	do {
>  		ticks--;
>  		update_wall_time_one_tick();
> -		if (xtime.tv_nsec >= 1000000000) {
> +		if ((unsigned long)xtime.tv_nsec >= 1000000000) {
>  			xtime.tv_nsec -= 1000000000;
>  			xtime.tv_sec++;
>  			second_overflow();
> 

maybe here a :

while ((unsigned long)xtime.tv_nsec >= 1000000000) {
	xtime.tv_nsec -= 1000000000;
	xtime.tv_sec++;
	second_overflow();
	...
	}


Eric

  reply	other threads:[~2005-09-01 21:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-09-01 21:03 [RFC][PATCH] Use proper casting with signed timespec.tv_nsec values john stultz
2005-09-01 21:37 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2005-09-01 22:25   ` john stultz
2005-09-02  1:14 ` George Anzinger
2005-09-06 17:33 ` Christoph Lameter
2005-09-06 19:54   ` john stultz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4317749E.3020109@cosmosbay.com \
    --to=dada1@cosmosbay.com \
    --cc=johnstul@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox