public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alon Bar-Lev <alon.barlev@gmail.com>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: THE LINUX/I386 BOOT PROTOCOL - Breaking the 256 limit
Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2005 23:49:12 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <431E00C8.3060606@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <431DFEC3.1070309@zytor.com>


Thank you for the reply,

H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> 
>>
>> Hello Peter, I've written a reply before but got no response...
>>
>> The idea of putting arguments in initramfs is not practical, since the 
>> whole idea is to have the same image of system and affecting its 
>> behavior using the boot loader...
>>
> 
> No, you're wrong.  The boot loader can synthesize an initramfs.

Hmm... Isn't it somewhat big change for them?
Do you mean that they can add a text file at root containing 
the command-line?
It is not so good... Since currently many scripts looks at 
/proc/cmdline and get the arguments they are interested in... 
The initramfs will not allow this... And there is no access to 
initramfs files after control is passed to root, since most 
distributions erase its contents in order to free memory...

> 
> Already pushed to Andrew.  I will follow it up with a patch to extend 
> the command line, at least to 512.

Thanks!!!
But why not making it a configuration option?
For example, I think it should be at least 1024...

Will this patch update the document?
If it does please don't specify maximum size,
The boot loader should be instructed to put unlimited 
string... OK... there is no thing like unlimited, so max 16K :)

Only the kernel should truncate it to the right size.

Best Regards,
Alon Bar-Lev.

  reply	other threads:[~2005-09-06 20:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <4315B668.6030603@gmail.com>
2005-08-31 21:29 ` THE LINUX/I386 BOOT PROTOCOL - Breaking the 256 limit H. Peter Anvin
2005-08-31 21:57   ` Chris Wedgwood
2005-08-31 22:01     ` H. Peter Anvin
2005-08-31 22:07       ` Chris Wedgwood
2005-08-31 22:12         ` Jesper Juhl
2005-08-31 22:14           ` Chris Wedgwood
2005-08-31 22:17             ` H. Peter Anvin
2005-08-31 22:18             ` Jesper Juhl
2005-08-31 22:24               ` H. Peter Anvin
2005-09-01  8:54                 ` Alon Bar-Lev
2005-08-31 22:12         ` H. Peter Anvin
2005-08-31 22:15           ` Chris Wedgwood
2005-09-01 20:48         ` [syslinux] " Peter Jones
2005-09-06 20:19       ` Alon Bar-Lev
2005-09-06 20:40         ` H. Peter Anvin
2005-09-06 20:49           ` Alon Bar-Lev [this message]
2005-10-06 22:49             ` Georg Lippold
2005-10-10 12:44               ` [PATCH] " Georg Lippold
2005-10-10 13:21                 ` Jesper Juhl
2005-10-10 13:32                   ` Alon Bar-Lev
2005-10-10 13:57                     ` Georg Lippold
2005-10-10 14:07                       ` Alon Bar-Lev
2005-10-10 14:53                   ` H. Peter Anvin
2005-10-10 14:59                     ` Alon Bar-Lev
2005-10-10 15:03                       ` H. Peter Anvin
2005-10-10 16:23                         ` Alon Bar-Lev
2005-10-10 17:02                           ` Bernd Petrovitsch
2005-10-10 15:46                     ` Georg Lippold
2005-10-10 15:49                       ` H. Peter Anvin
2005-10-10 17:16                         ` [PATCH 1/1] 2.6.14-rc3 x86: COMMAND_LINE_SIZE Georg Lippold
2005-10-10 18:24                           ` Alon Bar-Lev
2005-10-10 20:36                             ` Georg Lippold
2005-10-11  8:32                               ` Alon Bar-Lev
2005-10-11 16:50                                 ` Georg Lippold
2005-10-11 17:44                                   ` Alon Bar-Lev
2005-10-11 19:21                                     ` Andi Kleen
2005-10-11 19:24                                       ` Alon Bar-Lev
2005-10-11 20:21                                         ` Andi Kleen
2005-10-11 20:04                                           ` Alon Bar-Lev
2005-10-13 20:18                                             ` Georg Lippold
2005-10-11  1:48           ` THE LINUX/I386 BOOT PROTOCOL - Breaking the 256 limit Coywolf Qi Hunt
2005-10-11  1:49             ` H. Peter Anvin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=431E00C8.3060606@gmail.com \
    --to=alon.barlev@gmail.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox