From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751306AbVIGURM (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Sep 2005 16:17:12 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751307AbVIGURL (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Sep 2005 16:17:11 -0400 Received: from [85.8.12.41] ([85.8.12.41]:20096 "EHLO smtp.drzeus.cx") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751306AbVIGURK (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Sep 2005 16:17:10 -0400 Message-ID: <431F4AC4.9030206@drzeus.cx> Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2005 22:17:08 +0200 From: Pierre Ossman User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6-1.1.fc4 (X11/20050720) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Pavel Machek , linux-pm@osdl.org Subject: Re: swsusp doesn't suspend devices References: <431ECCE3.8080408@drzeus.cx> <200509072203.19283.rjw@sisk.pl> In-Reply-To: <200509072203.19283.rjw@sisk.pl> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.90.1.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >On Wednesday, 7 of September 2005 13:20, Pierre Ossman wrote: > > >>It would seem that swsusp doesn't properly suspend devices, or more >>precisely it wakes them up again before suspending the machine. >> >> > >Yes, it does. By design. > > > That seems counter-productive, so I'm obviously missing something.