public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Cc: Jim Gifford <maillist@jg555.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Pure 64 bootloaders
Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2005 04:39:00 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <43229BA4.4010306@pobox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <p73k6hp2up7.fsf@verdi.suse.de>

Andi Kleen wrote:
> Jim Gifford <maillist@jg555.com> writes:
> 
> 
>>I have been working on a project to create a Pure 64 bit distro of
>>linux, nothing 32 bit in the system. I can accomplish that with no
> 
> 
> Hopefully you're using /lib64 for that, otherwise your
> packages will be incompatible to everybody else and not 
> FHS compliant. If you don't please don't submit any 
> patches to hardcode this to upstream packages.

/lib64 is an awful scheme.  I'd avoid it.

Consider what happens in the existing scenario where you have capability 
to run both IA64 and x86-64 binaries on the same system.


> The problem is that there is currently no defined protocol
> for passing data to the 64bit part of the kernel, so while
> it would be possible to write a boot loader that starts
> a 64bit kernel it would be very kernel version dependent.

Good point.

	Jeff



  reply	other threads:[~2005-09-10  8:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-09-10  7:42 Pure 64 bootloaders Jim Gifford
2005-09-10  7:52 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-09-10  8:01 ` David S. Miller
2005-09-11 16:33   ` Jim Gifford
2005-09-11 18:48     ` David S. Miller
2005-09-11 18:49     ` David S. Miller
2005-09-10  8:28 ` Andi Kleen
2005-09-10  8:39   ` Jeff Garzik [this message]
2005-09-10 16:34     ` Chris Wedgwood
2005-09-10 18:15       ` David S. Miller
2005-09-12 21:32       ` Joe Bob Spamtest
2005-09-12 21:41         ` David S. Miller
2005-09-12 22:02           ` Joe Bob Spamtest
2005-09-12 22:12             ` David S. Miller
2005-09-12 23:09               ` Joe Bob Spamtest
2005-09-13 16:52                 ` Lennart Sorensen
2005-09-13 17:00                   ` Joe Bob Spamtest
2005-09-14  3:44                     ` Kyle Moffett
2005-09-14 13:20                       ` Lennart Sorensen
2005-09-14 17:26                         ` Kyle Moffett
2005-09-13 17:21                   ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2005-09-13 19:37                     ` Lennart Sorensen
2005-09-14  9:39                       ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2005-09-10 18:30     ` Harald Dunkel
2005-09-12 14:50       ` Roger Heflin
2005-09-13 17:14         ` Bastian Blank
2005-09-15  6:16         ` Harald Dunkel
2005-09-11 11:53   ` Stephen Frost
2005-09-11 14:14     ` Stefan Smietanowski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=43229BA4.4010306@pobox.com \
    --to=jgarzik@pobox.com \
    --cc=ak@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maillist@jg555.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox