From: Peter Staubach <staubach@redhat.com>
To: Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
dwmw2@infradead.org, bunk@stusta.de, johnstul@us.ibm.com,
drepper@redhat.com, Franz.Fischer@goyellow.de,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [UPDATE PATCH][Bug 5132] fix sys_poll() large timeout handling
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2005 11:19:32 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <43259C84.5020209@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050912150541.GA25471@us.ibm.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1045 bytes --]
Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
>
>I don't think the embedded folks are going to be ok with adding a 64-bit
>div in the poll() common-path... But otherwise the patch looks pretty
>sane, except I think you want s64, not int64_t? I can't ever remember
>myself :)
>
>
Oops, I missed an include which is required. The updated patch is attached.
A 64 bit quantity divided by a 32 bit quantity seems to be a standard
interface in the kernel and is used fairly widely, so I suspect that
the embedded folks have already done the work.
I don't know which should be used, s64 or int64_t. I chose int64_t
because then it would (more or less) match the interface of do_div().
>I agree the interface mght be mis-defined. And changing timeout_msecs()
>to an integer is consistent with the size of millisecond-unit variables
>used elsewhere in the kernel.
>
Yes, it also makes the kernel definition for sys_poll() match the user level
definition for poll(2) found in <poll.h>.
Thanx...
ps
Signed-off-by: Peter Staubach <staubach@redhat.com>
[-- Attachment #2: select.devel --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 2111 bytes --]
--- linux-2.6.13/fs/select.c.org 2005-08-28 19:41:01.000000000 -0400
+++ linux-2.6.13/fs/select.c 2005-09-12 11:11:53.000000000 -0400
@@ -24,6 +24,7 @@
#include <linux/fs.h>
#include <asm/uaccess.h>
+#include <asm/div64.h>
#define ROUND_UP(x,y) (((x)+(y)-1)/(y))
#define DEFAULT_POLLMASK (POLLIN | POLLOUT | POLLRDNORM | POLLWRNORM)
@@ -457,25 +458,34 @@ static int do_poll(unsigned int nfds, s
return count;
}
-asmlinkage long sys_poll(struct pollfd __user * ufds, unsigned int nfds, long timeout)
+asmlinkage long sys_poll(struct pollfd __user * ufds, unsigned int nfds, int timeout_msecs)
{
struct poll_wqueues table;
int fdcount, err;
unsigned int i;
struct poll_list *head;
struct poll_list *walk;
+ long timeout;
+ int64_t lltimeout;
/* Do a sanity check on nfds ... */
if (nfds > current->files->max_fdset && nfds > OPEN_MAX)
return -EINVAL;
- if (timeout) {
- /* Careful about overflow in the intermediate values */
- if ((unsigned long) timeout < MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT / HZ)
- timeout = (unsigned long)(timeout*HZ+999)/1000+1;
- else /* Negative or overflow */
+ if (timeout_msecs) {
+ if (timeout_msecs < 0)
timeout = MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT;
- }
+ else {
+ lltimeout = (int64_t)timeout_msecs * HZ + 999;
+ do_div(lltimeout, 1000);
+ lltimeout++;
+ if (lltimeout > MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT)
+ timeout = MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT;
+ else
+ timeout = (long)lltimeout;
+ }
+ } else
+ timeout = 0;
poll_initwait(&table);
--- linux-2.6.13/include/linux/syscalls.h.org 2005-08-28 19:41:01.000000000 -0400
+++ linux-2.6.13/include/linux/syscalls.h 2005-09-12 10:22:25.000000000 -0400
@@ -420,7 +420,7 @@ asmlinkage long sys_socketpair(int, int,
asmlinkage long sys_socketcall(int call, unsigned long __user *args);
asmlinkage long sys_listen(int, int);
asmlinkage long sys_poll(struct pollfd __user *ufds, unsigned int nfds,
- long timeout);
+ int timeout_msecs);
asmlinkage long sys_select(int n, fd_set __user *inp, fd_set __user *outp,
fd_set __user *exp, struct timeval __user *tvp);
asmlinkage long sys_epoll_create(int size);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-09-12 15:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-08-31 20:01 [PATCH][Bug 5132] fix sys_poll() large timeout handling Nishanth Aravamudan
2005-09-06 21:25 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2005-09-10 0:35 ` [UPDATE PATCH][Bug " Nishanth Aravamudan
2005-09-10 1:16 ` Andrew Morton
2005-09-10 2:23 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2005-09-10 2:36 ` Andrew Morton
2005-09-10 2:55 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2005-09-12 14:30 ` Peter Staubach
2005-09-12 15:05 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2005-09-12 15:19 ` Peter Staubach [this message]
2005-09-12 16:06 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=43259C84.5020209@redhat.com \
--to=staubach@redhat.com \
--cc=Franz.Fischer@goyellow.de \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=bunk@stusta.de \
--cc=drepper@redhat.com \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=johnstul@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nacc@us.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox