public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Staubach <staubach@redhat.com>
To: Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
	dwmw2@infradead.org, bunk@stusta.de, johnstul@us.ibm.com,
	drepper@redhat.com, Franz.Fischer@goyellow.de,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [UPDATE PATCH][Bug 5132] fix sys_poll() large timeout handling
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2005 11:19:32 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <43259C84.5020209@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050912150541.GA25471@us.ibm.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1045 bytes --]

Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:

>
>I don't think the embedded folks are going to be ok with adding a 64-bit
>div in the poll() common-path... But otherwise the patch looks pretty
>sane, except I think you want s64, not int64_t? I can't ever remember
>myself :)
>  
>

Oops, I missed an include which is required.  The updated patch is attached.

A 64 bit quantity divided by a 32 bit quantity seems to be a standard
interface in the kernel and is used fairly widely, so I suspect that
the embedded folks have already done the work.

I don't know which should be used, s64 or int64_t.  I chose int64_t
because then it would (more or less) match the interface of do_div().

>I agree the interface mght be mis-defined. And changing timeout_msecs()
>to an integer is consistent with the size of millisecond-unit variables
>used elsewhere in the kernel.
>

Yes, it also makes the kernel definition for sys_poll() match the user level
definition for poll(2) found in <poll.h>.

    Thanx...

       ps

Signed-off-by: Peter Staubach <staubach@redhat.com>

[-- Attachment #2: select.devel --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 2111 bytes --]

--- linux-2.6.13/fs/select.c.org	2005-08-28 19:41:01.000000000 -0400
+++ linux-2.6.13/fs/select.c	2005-09-12 11:11:53.000000000 -0400
@@ -24,6 +24,7 @@
 #include <linux/fs.h>
 
 #include <asm/uaccess.h>
+#include <asm/div64.h>
 
 #define ROUND_UP(x,y) (((x)+(y)-1)/(y))
 #define DEFAULT_POLLMASK (POLLIN | POLLOUT | POLLRDNORM | POLLWRNORM)
@@ -457,25 +458,34 @@ static int do_poll(unsigned int nfds,  s
 	return count;
 }
 
-asmlinkage long sys_poll(struct pollfd __user * ufds, unsigned int nfds, long timeout)
+asmlinkage long sys_poll(struct pollfd __user * ufds, unsigned int nfds, int timeout_msecs)
 {
 	struct poll_wqueues table;
  	int fdcount, err;
  	unsigned int i;
 	struct poll_list *head;
  	struct poll_list *walk;
+	long timeout;
+	int64_t lltimeout;
 
 	/* Do a sanity check on nfds ... */
 	if (nfds > current->files->max_fdset && nfds > OPEN_MAX)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
-	if (timeout) {
-		/* Careful about overflow in the intermediate values */
-		if ((unsigned long) timeout < MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT / HZ)
-			timeout = (unsigned long)(timeout*HZ+999)/1000+1;
-		else /* Negative or overflow */
+	if (timeout_msecs) {
+		if (timeout_msecs < 0)
 			timeout = MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT;
-	}
+		else {
+			lltimeout = (int64_t)timeout_msecs * HZ + 999;
+			do_div(lltimeout, 1000);
+			lltimeout++;
+			if (lltimeout > MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT)
+				timeout = MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT;
+			else
+				timeout = (long)lltimeout;
+		}
+	} else
+		timeout = 0;
 
 	poll_initwait(&table);
 
--- linux-2.6.13/include/linux/syscalls.h.org	2005-08-28 19:41:01.000000000 -0400
+++ linux-2.6.13/include/linux/syscalls.h	2005-09-12 10:22:25.000000000 -0400
@@ -420,7 +420,7 @@ asmlinkage long sys_socketpair(int, int,
 asmlinkage long sys_socketcall(int call, unsigned long __user *args);
 asmlinkage long sys_listen(int, int);
 asmlinkage long sys_poll(struct pollfd __user *ufds, unsigned int nfds,
-				long timeout);
+				int timeout_msecs);
 asmlinkage long sys_select(int n, fd_set __user *inp, fd_set __user *outp,
 			fd_set __user *exp, struct timeval __user *tvp);
 asmlinkage long sys_epoll_create(int size);

  reply	other threads:[~2005-09-12 15:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-08-31 20:01 [PATCH][Bug 5132] fix sys_poll() large timeout handling Nishanth Aravamudan
2005-09-06 21:25 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2005-09-10  0:35   ` [UPDATE PATCH][Bug " Nishanth Aravamudan
2005-09-10  1:16     ` Andrew Morton
2005-09-10  2:23       ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2005-09-10  2:36         ` Andrew Morton
2005-09-10  2:55           ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2005-09-12 14:30             ` Peter Staubach
2005-09-12 15:05               ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2005-09-12 15:19                 ` Peter Staubach [this message]
2005-09-12 16:06                   ` Nishanth Aravamudan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=43259C84.5020209@redhat.com \
    --to=staubach@redhat.com \
    --cc=Franz.Fischer@goyellow.de \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=bunk@stusta.de \
    --cc=drepper@redhat.com \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=johnstul@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nacc@us.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox