From: Joe Bob Spamtest <joebob@spamtest.viacore.net>
To: Chris Wedgwood <cw@f00f.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Pure 64 bootloaders
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2005 14:32:05 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4325F3D5.9040109@spamtest.viacore.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050910163446.GA2232@taniwha.stupidest.org>
Chris Wedgwood wrote:
>> /lib64 is an awful scheme. I'd avoid it.
> I'd like to see people move away from it before it gets too entrenched
> too.
agreed -- as far as i'm concerned the 32 bit libraries are there for
compatibility's sake and should be in /lib/compat/<subarch> instead of
/lib. the native libraries should be in /lib instead of /lib64. lib64
should just go away!
but then again, nobody asked for *my* input before this fhs spec came
out, so ...
-kelsey
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-09-12 21:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-09-10 7:42 Pure 64 bootloaders Jim Gifford
2005-09-10 7:52 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-09-10 8:01 ` David S. Miller
2005-09-11 16:33 ` Jim Gifford
2005-09-11 18:48 ` David S. Miller
2005-09-11 18:49 ` David S. Miller
2005-09-10 8:28 ` Andi Kleen
2005-09-10 8:39 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-09-10 16:34 ` Chris Wedgwood
2005-09-10 18:15 ` David S. Miller
2005-09-12 21:32 ` Joe Bob Spamtest [this message]
2005-09-12 21:41 ` David S. Miller
2005-09-12 22:02 ` Joe Bob Spamtest
2005-09-12 22:12 ` David S. Miller
2005-09-12 23:09 ` Joe Bob Spamtest
2005-09-13 16:52 ` Lennart Sorensen
2005-09-13 17:00 ` Joe Bob Spamtest
2005-09-14 3:44 ` Kyle Moffett
2005-09-14 13:20 ` Lennart Sorensen
2005-09-14 17:26 ` Kyle Moffett
2005-09-13 17:21 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2005-09-13 19:37 ` Lennart Sorensen
2005-09-14 9:39 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2005-09-10 18:30 ` Harald Dunkel
2005-09-12 14:50 ` Roger Heflin
2005-09-13 17:14 ` Bastian Blank
2005-09-15 6:16 ` Harald Dunkel
2005-09-11 11:53 ` Stephen Frost
2005-09-11 14:14 ` Stefan Smietanowski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4325F3D5.9040109@spamtest.viacore.net \
--to=joebob@spamtest.viacore.net \
--cc=cw@f00f.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox