From: iSteve <isteve@rulez.cz>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: query_modules syscall gone? Any replacement?
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 16:11:26 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4326DE0E.2060306@rulez.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E1EDpQq-0000iV-Oe@be1.lrz>
Okay, so, I have so far gathered:
- the whole module interface change between 2.4 and 2.6 was because
some security concerns, most of the stuff (loading module etc.) moved
towards kernel
- query_module is gone, there is no syscall similar in function but
with different name
- losing of query_module also prevents binary-only modules
(guesswork@work)
- /proc/modules and /sys/module interface doesn't by far supply what
query_module could do
My questions are:
a) Are my observations correct? Where did I go wrong?
b) Is there any planned replacement of query_module, or extendind sysfs
or procfs module interface?
c) Wouldn't revamping query_module also allow binary-only modules,
therefore easier decisions for vendors, whether to support Linux?
Thanks in advance and sorry for these probably quite silly questions.
- iSteve
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-09-13 14:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <4KSFY-2pO-17@gated-at.bofh.it>
2005-09-09 20:25 ` query_modules syscall gone? Any replacement? Bodo Eggert
2005-09-09 20:33 ` iSteve
2005-09-13 14:11 ` iSteve [this message]
2005-09-13 15:15 ` Randy.Dunlap
2005-09-13 15:30 ` iSteve
2005-09-13 15:44 ` Randy.Dunlap
2005-09-13 16:26 ` iSteve
2005-09-13 16:52 ` Randy.Dunlap
2005-09-13 19:50 ` Daniel Barkalow
2005-09-13 15:50 ` Jesper Juhl
2005-09-09 15:02 iSteve
2005-09-09 15:27 ` linux-os (Dick Johnson)
2005-09-09 16:10 ` iSteve
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4326DE0E.2060306@rulez.cz \
--to=isteve@rulez.cz \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox