public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>
To: Sripathi Kodi <sripathik@in.ibm.com>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, patrics@interia.pl,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.13.1] Patch for invisible threads
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2005 10:37:40 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <432835B4.7070405@tmr.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <43278116.8020403@in.ibm.com>

Sripathi Kodi wrote:
> Linus Torvalds wrote:
> 
>> I don't think this is wrong per se, but you shouldn't take the 
>> tasklist lock normally. You're better off just doing
> 
> 
> Linus,
> 
> I incarporated the path that doesn't hold tasklist lock unnecessarily. 
> The patch is below. This seems to work without any problems for me.
> 
> If the decision is to remove ->permission, I can send a small patch I 
> have that removes .permission entry from proc_task_inode_operations. 
> Either way fixes the problem I found.

Let me say that this solution, and any other which loops through all 
threads of a task, isn't going to scale well. I don't have a magic O(1) 
solution, if it were easy someone would have done that instead of the 
while loop, just noting that a clever solution would be a win on servers.

> 
> Thanks and regards,
> Sripathi.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sripathi Kodi <sripathik@in.ibm.com>
> 
> --- linux-2.6.13.1-orig/fs/proc/base.c    2005-09-14 03:46:22.000000000 
> -0500
> +++ linux-2.6.13.1/fs/proc/base.c    2005-09-14 03:48:35.000000000 -0500
> @@ -275,11 +275,33 @@ static int proc_root_link(struct inode *
>  {
>      struct fs_struct *fs;
>      int result = -ENOENT;
> -    task_lock(proc_task(inode));
> -    fs = proc_task(inode)->fs;
> -    if(fs)
> +    struct task_struct *leader = proc_task(inode);
> +
> +    task_lock(leader);
> +    fs = leader->fs;
> +    if (fs) {
>          atomic_inc(&fs->count);
> -    task_unlock(proc_task(inode));
> +        task_unlock(leader);
> +    } else {
> +        /* Try to get fs from sub-threads */
> +        task_unlock(leader);
> +        struct task_struct *task = leader;
> +        read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
> +        if (pid_alive(task)) {
> +            while ((task = next_thread(task)) != leader) {
> +                task_lock(task);
> +                fs = task->fs;
> +                if (fs) {
> +                    atomic_inc(&fs->count);
> +                    task_unlock(task);
> +                    break;
> +                }
> +                task_unlock(task);
> +            }
> +        }
> +        read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
> +    }
> +
>      if (fs) {
>          read_lock(&fs->lock);
>          *mnt = mntget(fs->rootmnt);
> 


  parent reply	other threads:[~2005-09-14 14:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-09-12 17:46 [PATCH 2.6.13.1] Patch for invisible threads Sripathi Kodi
2005-09-12 20:49 ` Andrew Morton
2005-09-13 13:10   ` Sripathi Kodi
2005-09-13 14:53     ` Linus Torvalds
2005-09-13 16:51       ` Al Viro
2005-09-13 17:01         ` Linus Torvalds
2005-09-13 17:12           ` Al Viro
2005-09-13 21:30             ` Sripathi Kodi
2005-09-13 21:56               ` Roland McGrath
2005-09-13 21:57               ` Al Viro
2005-09-13 23:10               ` Linus Torvalds
2005-09-14  1:47                 ` Sripathi Kodi
2005-09-14  1:52                   ` Al Viro
2005-09-14 14:37                   ` Bill Davidsen [this message]
2005-09-15  0:30                     ` Sripathi Kodi
2005-09-14  1:50                 ` Al Viro
2005-09-15  0:31                   ` Sripathi Kodi
2005-09-15  0:55                     ` Roland McGrath
2005-09-15  1:38                       ` Sripathi Kodi
2005-09-15  2:12                         ` Al Viro
2005-09-15  7:29                           ` Roland McGrath
2005-09-15  1:18                     ` Al Viro
2005-09-16  0:54                       ` Sripathi Kodi
2005-09-16  7:46                         ` Al Viro
2005-09-16 15:06                           ` Sripathi Kodi
2005-09-16 18:05                           ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-09-16 18:14                             ` Al Viro

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=432835B4.7070405@tmr.com \
    --to=davidsen@tmr.com \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=patrics@interia.pl \
    --cc=roland@redhat.com \
    --cc=sripathik@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox