public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* USB mass storage issue in 2.6.13
@ 2005-09-14 18:11 Bill Davidsen
       [not found] ` <20050914221537.GA10943@taniwha.stupidest.org>
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Bill Davidsen @ 2005-09-14 18:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Andrew Morton, Linux Kernel Mailing List

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1031 bytes --]

You asked for more info on the problem that USB mounted storage because 
inaccessable after an indeterminate delay. I eventually got a chance to 
reboot back to the offending kernel, and it has eventually happened 
again. I don't know when exactly, but the system has only been up 12 
days and was up 40-50 days without the issue using an earlier kernel, 
2.6.7rc1mm1nd (-mm1 + nick P patches), 2.6.10-ac10, and I don't recall 
that uptime with 2.6.13rc5git1, but I didn't see the problem pre-2.6.13.

Attached is a zip with the original dmesg and what somes out of dmesg 
-s200000 now. I'd give you the config, but it's on the disk I can no 
longer see, and I'm unlikely to reboot until the weekend, unless I must 
get to the data enough to justify a reboot while monitoring is running. 
The config hasn't changed in a while, at least not more than "make 
oldconfig" does for me.

-- 

   -bill davidsen (davidsen@tmr.com)
"The secret to procrastination is to put things off until the
 last possible moment - but no longer"  -me


[-- Attachment #2: USB_FU.zip --]
[-- Type: application/zip, Size: 10721 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: USB mass storage issue in 2.6.13
       [not found] ` <20050914221537.GA10943@taniwha.stupidest.org>
@ 2005-09-15 14:02   ` Bill Davidsen
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Bill Davidsen @ 2005-09-15 14:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Linux Kernel mailing List

Chris Wedgwood wrote:

>On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 02:11:06PM -0400, Bill Davidsen wrote:
>
>  
>
>>Attached is a zip with the original dmesg and what somes out of
>>dmesg -s200000 now.
>>    
>>
>
>argh, why zip? it really blows for this sort of thing
>
>  
>
So does sending the whole huge file without compression. The advantage
of zip is that both relevant files can be put in one archive, and that
both archive and per-file comments can be added to make it clear what
each does. I could have done a compressed tar and an explanation, but
then you have to uncompress it to read the explanation.

I didn't pick that without thinking about it, and it seems at least as
useful as anything else which comes to mind, like multiple attachments.

-- 
bill davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>
  CTO TMR Associates, Inc
  Doing interesting things with small computers since 1979



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2005-09-15 13:45 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-09-14 18:11 USB mass storage issue in 2.6.13 Bill Davidsen
     [not found] ` <20050914221537.GA10943@taniwha.stupidest.org>
2005-09-15 14:02   ` Bill Davidsen

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox