* USB mass storage issue in 2.6.13
@ 2005-09-14 18:11 Bill Davidsen
[not found] ` <20050914221537.GA10943@taniwha.stupidest.org>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Bill Davidsen @ 2005-09-14 18:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Morton, Linux Kernel Mailing List
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1031 bytes --]
You asked for more info on the problem that USB mounted storage because
inaccessable after an indeterminate delay. I eventually got a chance to
reboot back to the offending kernel, and it has eventually happened
again. I don't know when exactly, but the system has only been up 12
days and was up 40-50 days without the issue using an earlier kernel,
2.6.7rc1mm1nd (-mm1 + nick P patches), 2.6.10-ac10, and I don't recall
that uptime with 2.6.13rc5git1, but I didn't see the problem pre-2.6.13.
Attached is a zip with the original dmesg and what somes out of dmesg
-s200000 now. I'd give you the config, but it's on the disk I can no
longer see, and I'm unlikely to reboot until the weekend, unless I must
get to the data enough to justify a reboot while monitoring is running.
The config hasn't changed in a while, at least not more than "make
oldconfig" does for me.
--
-bill davidsen (davidsen@tmr.com)
"The secret to procrastination is to put things off until the
last possible moment - but no longer" -me
[-- Attachment #2: USB_FU.zip --]
[-- Type: application/zip, Size: 10721 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: USB mass storage issue in 2.6.13
[not found] ` <20050914221537.GA10943@taniwha.stupidest.org>
@ 2005-09-15 14:02 ` Bill Davidsen
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Bill Davidsen @ 2005-09-15 14:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel mailing List
Chris Wedgwood wrote:
>On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 02:11:06PM -0400, Bill Davidsen wrote:
>
>
>
>>Attached is a zip with the original dmesg and what somes out of
>>dmesg -s200000 now.
>>
>>
>
>argh, why zip? it really blows for this sort of thing
>
>
>
So does sending the whole huge file without compression. The advantage
of zip is that both relevant files can be put in one archive, and that
both archive and per-file comments can be added to make it clear what
each does. I could have done a compressed tar and an explanation, but
then you have to uncompress it to read the explanation.
I didn't pick that without thinking about it, and it seems at least as
useful as anything else which comes to mind, like multiple attachments.
--
bill davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>
CTO TMR Associates, Inc
Doing interesting things with small computers since 1979
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2005-09-15 13:45 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-09-14 18:11 USB mass storage issue in 2.6.13 Bill Davidsen
[not found] ` <20050914221537.GA10943@taniwha.stupidest.org>
2005-09-15 14:02 ` Bill Davidsen
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox