From: Peter Staubach <staubach@redhat.com>
To: Assar <assar@permabit.com>
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <marcelo.tosatti@cyclades.com>,
Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no>,
Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nfs client, kernel 2.4.31: readlink result overflow
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2005 14:55:29 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <43287221.8020602@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <784q8oivp4.fsf@sober-counsel.permabit.com>
Assar wrote:
>Peter Staubach <staubach@redhat.com> writes:
>
>>>Yes, but fs/nfs/nfs2xdr.c:nfs_xdr_readlinkres on 2.4.31 writes a 0 at
>>>the end of string after having received it, which is what started this
>>>thread. Look at the end of nfs_xdr_readlinkres.
>>>
>>Yes, I know that. For C purposes, the string must be null terminated.
>
>
>Then I'm sorry but I don't understand what your point was. Do you
>believe there's a bug in nfs_xdr_readlinkres and if so, how do you
>think it should work?
>
Yes, I think that there is a bug in the boundary checking. I think that:
if (len > rcvbuf->page_len)
should be
if (len >= rcvbuf->page_len - sizeof(u32) || len > 1024)
because the code puts the length in the first 4 bytes and then the
contents of the symbolic link is stored in the rest of the page.
The ">=" accounts for the null byte will be appended to the length.
The additional check for 1024 is due to the NFS Version 2 protocol
limiting the size of the contents of a symbolic link which can be
returned to 1024 bytes.
Also, the NFS Version 3, nfs3_xdr_readlinkres, is broken in the same
way and will need to be changed in the same fashion, except that
the NFS Version 3 protocol does not place an arbitrary limit on the
size of the contents of the symbolic which can be returned. The
comparison against 1024 won't be needed here.
--
The 2.6 kernel code is also broken, but in a different, but once again,
similar fashions.
ps
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-09-14 19:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-09-12 13:26 [PATCH] nfs client, kernel 2.4.31: readlink result overflow Assar
2005-09-12 18:46 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2005-09-12 19:37 ` Assar
2005-09-12 20:01 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2005-09-12 20:41 ` Assar
2005-09-12 20:53 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2005-09-13 18:39 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2005-09-13 18:52 ` Assar
2005-09-13 19:35 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2005-09-13 20:01 ` Assar
2005-09-14 18:55 ` Peter Staubach [this message]
2005-09-14 19:41 ` Assar
2005-09-14 20:11 ` Peter Staubach
2005-09-14 22:20 ` Assar
2005-09-14 22:26 ` Peter Staubach
2005-09-14 20:15 ` Peter Staubach
2005-09-14 20:26 ` Assar
2005-09-14 20:27 ` Peter Staubach
2005-09-14 20:59 ` Assar
2005-09-13 20:36 ` Peter Staubach
2005-09-13 20:55 ` Assar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=43287221.8020602@redhat.com \
--to=staubach@redhat.com \
--cc=Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu \
--cc=assar@permabit.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marcelo.tosatti@cyclades.com \
--cc=trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox