From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030419AbVIONpE (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Sep 2005 09:45:04 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1030420AbVIONpE (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Sep 2005 09:45:04 -0400 Received: from mail.tmr.com ([64.65.253.246]:63117 "EHLO gaimboi.tmr.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030419AbVIONpC (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Sep 2005 09:45:02 -0400 Message-ID: <43297F0C.4060404@tmr.com> Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2005 10:02:52 -0400 From: Bill Davidsen Organization: TMR Associates Inc, Schenectady NY User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.11) Gecko/20050729 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Linux Kernel mailing List Subject: Re: USB mass storage issue in 2.6.13 References: <432867BA.1000700@tmr.com> <20050914221537.GA10943@taniwha.stupidest.org> In-Reply-To: <20050914221537.GA10943@taniwha.stupidest.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Chris Wedgwood wrote: >On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 02:11:06PM -0400, Bill Davidsen wrote: > > > >>Attached is a zip with the original dmesg and what somes out of >>dmesg -s200000 now. >> >> > >argh, why zip? it really blows for this sort of thing > > > So does sending the whole huge file without compression. The advantage of zip is that both relevant files can be put in one archive, and that both archive and per-file comments can be added to make it clear what each does. I could have done a compressed tar and an explanation, but then you have to uncompress it to read the explanation. I didn't pick that without thinking about it, and it seems at least as useful as anything else which comes to mind, like multiple attachments. -- bill davidsen CTO TMR Associates, Inc Doing interesting things with small computers since 1979