From: Petr Vandrovec <vandrove@vc.cvut.cz>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <clameter@engr.sgi.com>,
alokk@calsoftinc.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
manfred@colorfullife.com
Subject: Re: 2.6.14-rc1-git-now still dying in mm/slab - this time line 1849
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 23:25:53 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <43332161.20806@vc.cvut.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050922130150.0822b882.akpm@osdl.org>
Andrew Morton wrote:
> Christoph Lameter <clameter@engr.sgi.com> wrote:
>
>>On Wed, 21 Sep 2005, Christoph Lameter wrote:
>>
>> > Hmm. This likely has something to do with debugging code. I was unable to
>> > reproduce this on amd64 with your config. I get another failure with
>> > 2.6.14-rc2 on ia64 if I enable all the debugging features that you have.
>> > The system works fine if no debugging is configured:
>> >
>> > kernel BUG at kernel/workqueue.c:541!
>> > swapper[1]: bugcheck! 0 [1]
>>
>> I fixed the above issue (a structure became larger than the maximum
>> allowed by the slab allocator) and the kernel boots fine now on an 8 way
>> ia64. Cannot reproduce the problem.
>
>
> Petr can. I think we're still waiting for him to test the below (please):
Sorry, I've missed that half of email completely. Yes, it seems to fix problem,
box has currently 8 min uptime, which is 7:55 more than it survived before.
Thanks,
Petr Vandrovec
> Could you try the following patch:
>
> ---
>
> The numa slab allocator may allocate pages from foreign nodes onto the lists
> for a particular node if a node runs out of memory. Inspecting the slab->nodeid
> field will not reflect that the page is now in use for the slabs of another node.
>
> This patch fixes that issue by adding a node field to free_block so that the caller
> can indicate which node currently uses a slab.
>
> Also removes the check for the current node from kmalloc_cache_node since the
> process may shift later to another node which may lead to an allocation on another
> node than intended.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-09-22 21:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-09-15 16:51 2.6.14-rc1-git-now still dying in mm/slab - this time line 1849 Petr Vandrovec
2005-09-15 17:33 ` Petr Vandrovec
[not found] ` <20050916023005.4146e499.akpm@osdl.org>
[not found] ` <432AA00D.4030706@vc.cvut.cz>
[not found] ` <20050916230809.789d6b0b.akpm@osdl.org>
2005-09-19 16:02 ` Petr Vandrovec
2005-09-19 18:29 ` Andrew Morton
2005-09-19 18:51 ` Christoph Lameter
2005-09-19 19:28 ` Andrew Morton
2005-09-19 21:20 ` Christoph Lameter
2005-09-20 5:16 ` Andrew Morton
2005-09-20 8:34 ` Alok Kataria
2005-09-20 13:58 ` Petr Vandrovec
2005-09-21 1:03 ` Christoph Lameter
2005-09-21 1:22 ` Petr Vandrovec
2005-09-21 15:59 ` Christoph Lameter
2005-09-22 19:52 ` Christoph Lameter
2005-09-22 20:01 ` Andrew Morton
2005-09-22 21:25 ` Petr Vandrovec [this message]
2005-09-22 21:32 ` Christoph Lameter
2005-09-22 21:46 ` Andrew Morton
2005-09-22 21:54 ` Christoph Lameter
2005-09-23 0:25 ` Petr Vandrovec
2005-09-28 21:02 ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2005-09-28 22:50 ` Christoph Lameter
2005-09-29 16:43 ` Petr Vandrovec
2005-09-29 18:11 ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2005-09-29 18:38 ` Christoph Lameter
2005-09-30 5:45 ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2005-09-30 6:05 ` Andrew Morton
2005-09-30 6:28 ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2005-09-30 15:16 ` Bryan O'Sullivan
2005-09-30 15:57 ` Christoph Lameter
2005-09-30 16:45 ` Bryan O'Sullivan
2005-09-30 20:11 ` Andi Kleen
2005-09-30 20:23 ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2005-09-30 16:55 ` Christoph Lameter
2005-09-19 18:56 ` Petr Vandrovec
2005-09-19 19:08 ` Christoph Lameter
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-09-23 19:34 Alok Kataria
2005-09-23 23:57 ` Christoph Lameter
2005-09-24 0:05 ` Christoph Lameter
2005-09-24 12:52 ` Manfred Spraul
2005-09-25 14:16 Alok Kataria
2005-09-26 18:00 ` Christoph Lameter
2005-09-26 19:34 ` Alok Kataria
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=43332161.20806@vc.cvut.cz \
--to=vandrove@vc.cvut.cz \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=alokk@calsoftinc.com \
--cc=clameter@engr.sgi.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=manfred@colorfullife.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox