From: Petr Vandrovec <vandrove@vc.cvut.cz>
To: Christoph Lameter <clameter@engr.sgi.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
alokk@calsoftinc.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
manfred@colorfullife.com
Subject: Re: 2.6.14-rc1-git-now still dying in mm/slab - this time line 1849
Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2005 02:25:54 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <43334B92.8010800@vc.cvut.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.62.0509221448360.18810@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>
Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Sep 2005, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
>
>>Great, thanks. Christoph, was that patch the final official version?
>
>
> This should deal with the node ownership issue. So yes.
>
> I still have some open question on how pages ended up on the wrong node.
> This should only happen if a zone / node has run out of memory. If pages
> ended up on the wrong node without that then there may be a different
> issue still to be fixed.
>
> Maybe Petr can give us some more details on when the problem occurs?
Problem seems to happen immediately, and just first run of cache_reap
(2 seconds after eventd initializes if I understand it correctly) already
finds problem.
But I'm confused. I've just added code which is supposed to verify all
additions to the cache entry[] (http://platan.vc.cvut.cz/verify-all-entry-add.diff)
on the top of Christoph patch to catch one which later causes problem in cache_reap,
and it logs nothing at the time crash was happening :-( Only incident it logs is
"while (batchcount > 0)" loop in cache_alloc_refill, saying that
objp ffff81007ffd9430 belonging to the slab ffff81007ffd9000 which belongs
to node 1 was added to array_cache belonging to node 0 (called from
ffffffff8016e4a9) (mm/slab.c ~ line 2430)
... cache avc_node
This repeats couple of times, for avc_node, mnt_cache, proc_inode_cache
and bdev_cache. Nothing else.
So I've reverted your fix, and still I did not catch offender, so I'm probably
missing some place which populates array_cache entry[] :-(
Only if after I added logging to free_block() I was able to find that offender is
proc_inode_cache. But I have no idea how this object appeared in the incorrect
node cache...
Petr
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-09-23 0:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-09-15 16:51 2.6.14-rc1-git-now still dying in mm/slab - this time line 1849 Petr Vandrovec
2005-09-15 17:33 ` Petr Vandrovec
[not found] ` <20050916023005.4146e499.akpm@osdl.org>
[not found] ` <432AA00D.4030706@vc.cvut.cz>
[not found] ` <20050916230809.789d6b0b.akpm@osdl.org>
2005-09-19 16:02 ` Petr Vandrovec
2005-09-19 18:29 ` Andrew Morton
2005-09-19 18:51 ` Christoph Lameter
2005-09-19 19:28 ` Andrew Morton
2005-09-19 21:20 ` Christoph Lameter
2005-09-20 5:16 ` Andrew Morton
2005-09-20 8:34 ` Alok Kataria
2005-09-20 13:58 ` Petr Vandrovec
2005-09-21 1:03 ` Christoph Lameter
2005-09-21 1:22 ` Petr Vandrovec
2005-09-21 15:59 ` Christoph Lameter
2005-09-22 19:52 ` Christoph Lameter
2005-09-22 20:01 ` Andrew Morton
2005-09-22 21:25 ` Petr Vandrovec
2005-09-22 21:32 ` Christoph Lameter
2005-09-22 21:46 ` Andrew Morton
2005-09-22 21:54 ` Christoph Lameter
2005-09-23 0:25 ` Petr Vandrovec [this message]
2005-09-28 21:02 ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2005-09-28 22:50 ` Christoph Lameter
2005-09-29 16:43 ` Petr Vandrovec
2005-09-29 18:11 ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2005-09-29 18:38 ` Christoph Lameter
2005-09-30 5:45 ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2005-09-30 6:05 ` Andrew Morton
2005-09-30 6:28 ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2005-09-30 15:16 ` Bryan O'Sullivan
2005-09-30 15:57 ` Christoph Lameter
2005-09-30 16:45 ` Bryan O'Sullivan
2005-09-30 20:11 ` Andi Kleen
2005-09-30 20:23 ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2005-09-30 16:55 ` Christoph Lameter
2005-09-19 18:56 ` Petr Vandrovec
2005-09-19 19:08 ` Christoph Lameter
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-09-23 19:34 Alok Kataria
2005-09-23 23:57 ` Christoph Lameter
2005-09-24 0:05 ` Christoph Lameter
2005-09-24 12:52 ` Manfred Spraul
2005-09-25 14:16 Alok Kataria
2005-09-26 18:00 ` Christoph Lameter
2005-09-26 19:34 ` Alok Kataria
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=43334B92.8010800@vc.cvut.cz \
--to=vandrove@vc.cvut.cz \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=alokk@calsoftinc.com \
--cc=clameter@engr.sgi.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=manfred@colorfullife.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox