public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
To: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
Cc: zwane@linuxpower.ca, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH linux-2.6 04/04] brsem: convert cpucontrol to brsem
Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2005 17:39:25 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4336542D.4000102@yahoo.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050925064218.642A9DFD@htj.dyndns.org>

Tejun Heo wrote:

> +/*
> + * cpucontrol is a brsem used to synchronize cpu hotplug events.
> + * Invoking lock_cpu_hotplug() read-locks cpucontrol and no
> + * hotplugging events will occur until it's released.
> + *
> + * Unfortunately, brsem itself makes use of lock_cpu_hotplug() and
> + * performing brsem write-lock operations on cpucontrol deadlocks.
> + * This is avoided by...
> + *
> + * a. guaranteeing that cpu hotplug events won't occur during the
> + *    write-lock operations, and
> + *
> + * b. skipping lock_cpu_hotplug() inside brsem.
> + *
> + * #a is achieved by acquiring and releasing cpucontrol_mutex outside
> + * cpucontrol write-lock.  #b is achieved by skipping
> + * lock_cpu_hotplug() inside brsem if the current task is
> + * cpucontrol_mutex holder (is_cpu_hotplug_holder() test).
> + *
> + * Also, note that cpucontrol is first initialized with
> + * BRSEM_BYPASS_INITIALIZER and then initialized again with
> + * __create_brsem() instead of simply using create_brsem().  This is
> + * necessary as cpucontrol brsem gets used way before brsem subsystem
> + * becomes up and running.
> + *
> + * Until brsem is properly initialized, all brsem ops succeed
> + * unconditionally.  cpucontrol becomes operational only after
> + * cpucontrol_init() is finished, which should be called after
> + * brsem_init_early().
> + */

Mmm, this is just insane IMO.

Note that I happen to also think the idea (brsems) have merit, and
that cpucontrol may be one of the places where a sane implementation
would actually be useful... but at least when you're introducing
this kind of complexity anywhere, you *really* need to be able to
back it up with numbers.

As far as the VFS race fix goes, I guess Al or someone else will
comment on its correctness. But I think it might be nicer to first
fix it with a regular rwsem and then show some numbers to justify
its conversion to a brsem.

If you need interruptible rwsems, I almost got an implementation
working a while back, and David Howells recently said he was
interested in doing them... so that's not an impossibility.

Nick

-- 
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.

Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com 

  reply	other threads:[~2005-09-25  7:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-09-25  6:43 [PATCH linux-2.6 00/04] brsem: [RFC] big reader semaphore Tejun Heo
2005-09-25  6:43 ` [PATCH linux-2.6 01/04] brsem: implement " Tejun Heo
2005-09-25  7:19   ` Nick Piggin
2005-09-25  8:03     ` Nick Piggin
2005-09-25  8:11     ` Tejun Heo
2005-09-25  8:27       ` Nick Piggin
2005-09-25  8:53         ` Tejun Heo
2005-09-25  9:24           ` Nick Piggin
2005-09-25 10:05             ` Tejun Heo
2005-09-25 11:22               ` Nick Piggin
2005-09-25  6:43 ` [PATCH linux-2.6 02/04] brsem: convert super_block->s_umount to brsem Tejun Heo
2005-09-25  6:43 ` [PATCH linux-2.6 03/04] brsem: fix ro-remount <-> open race condition Tejun Heo
2005-09-25  6:43 ` [PATCH linux-2.6 04/04] brsem: convert cpucontrol to brsem Tejun Heo
2005-09-25  7:39   ` Nick Piggin [this message]
2005-09-25  8:03     ` Tejun Heo
2005-09-25 23:46     ` Nathan Lynch
2005-09-26  1:11       ` Nick Piggin
2005-09-26  4:05         ` Tejun Heo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4336542D.4000102@yahoo.com.au \
    --to=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
    --cc=htejun@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=zwane@linuxpower.ca \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox