public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
To: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
Cc: viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH linux-2.6 01/04] brsem: implement big reader semaphore
Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2005 21:22:47 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <43368887.2020008@yahoo.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <43367676.1080308@gmail.com>

Tejun Heo wrote:

>  I did a busy-loop microbenchmark, and I think it's informative enough. :-)
> 

Great!

>  The following command is run on three versions - vanilla version, one 
> with read_down/up(->s_umount) added to vfs_write(), and one with 
> brsem_read_down/up(->s_umount) added to vfs_write().
> 
> # time -p dd if=/dev/zero of=out bs=32 count=10M
> 
>  The test is run three times and the results are averaged.
> 
> a. vanilla
> 
> real 58.63
> user 5.61
> sys 52.37
> 
> b. rwsem
> 
> real 59.24
> user 6.06
> sys 52.29
> 
> c. brsem
> 
> real 61.74
> user 5.78
> sys 55.04
> 
>  I don't think brsem has any chance of being faster than rwsem if it's 
> slower in this micro benchmark.  One weird thing is that the result of 
> rwsem consistently showed higher user time and lower system time than 
> vanilla (no synchronization) case, maybe oprofiling will tell something.
> 

Yep, probably just some timing or cache anomaly, generally just
sum the user and system time in the case where you are running
identical userspace code... I wouldn't worry too much about it.

>  Anyways, you were absolutely right.  My brsem was a pretty stupid idea 
> after all.  Let's hope at least I learned something from it.  :-(
> 

I wouldn't say stupid. Implementation was too complex, but some
clever ideas were required to solve the problems you identified.

There are definitely a couple of possible places where a brsem
may be useful, and I think cpucontrol semaphore is one of those.

Al can probably comment on its use in the superblock. It seems
fair enough, though I think we'll want to slim down my naive
rwsem array and maybe think about using alloc_percpu.

Is the remount case much rarer than mount/unmount? Do we need to
be careful about bloating the size of the superblock on large
machines? In that case maybe a global remount brsem will be
enough to handle this race?

-- 
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.

Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com 

  reply	other threads:[~2005-09-25 11:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-09-25  6:43 [PATCH linux-2.6 00/04] brsem: [RFC] big reader semaphore Tejun Heo
2005-09-25  6:43 ` [PATCH linux-2.6 01/04] brsem: implement " Tejun Heo
2005-09-25  7:19   ` Nick Piggin
2005-09-25  8:03     ` Nick Piggin
2005-09-25  8:11     ` Tejun Heo
2005-09-25  8:27       ` Nick Piggin
2005-09-25  8:53         ` Tejun Heo
2005-09-25  9:24           ` Nick Piggin
2005-09-25 10:05             ` Tejun Heo
2005-09-25 11:22               ` Nick Piggin [this message]
2005-09-25  6:43 ` [PATCH linux-2.6 02/04] brsem: convert super_block->s_umount to brsem Tejun Heo
2005-09-25  6:43 ` [PATCH linux-2.6 03/04] brsem: fix ro-remount <-> open race condition Tejun Heo
2005-09-25  6:43 ` [PATCH linux-2.6 04/04] brsem: convert cpucontrol to brsem Tejun Heo
2005-09-25  7:39   ` Nick Piggin
2005-09-25  8:03     ` Tejun Heo
2005-09-25 23:46     ` Nathan Lynch
2005-09-26  1:11       ` Nick Piggin
2005-09-26  4:05         ` Tejun Heo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=43368887.2020008@yahoo.com.au \
    --to=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
    --cc=htejun@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox