From: Vitaly Wool <vitalhome@rbcmail.ru>
To: David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>
Cc: vitalhome@rbcmail.ru, basicmark@yahoo.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dpervushin@ru.mvista.com
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] SPI subsystem
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2005 20:50:54 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <433826EE.9020107@rbcmail.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050915001429.BC6E7EA55C@adsl-69-107-32-110.dsl.pltn13.pacbell.net>
Hi David,
David Brownell wrote:
>Most platform drivers I've seen just handle the power on/off
>requests. I think there's some historical reason that the
>"reason" stuff exists ... but I suspect not many folk would
>get unhappy if that were removed, and those calls got simplified.
>
>
No, I can't agree with you. This state machine provides useful framework
for drivers that work with DMA and/or drivers that set their own wakeup
bits etc. etc. It allows the driver essence to enter the state where it
doesn't accept any new requests but is able to successfully finish the
current ones.
Best regards,
Vitaly
prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-09-26 16:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-09-03 10:13 [RFC][PATCH] SPI subsystem Mark Underwood
2005-09-09 21:39 ` David Brownell
2005-09-10 11:17 ` Mark Underwood
2005-09-15 0:08 ` David Brownell
2005-09-15 19:24 ` Mark Underwood
2005-09-15 22:14 ` David Brownell
2005-09-15 23:27 ` Mark Underwood
2005-09-16 3:25 ` David Brownell
2005-09-16 17:55 ` Mark Underwood
2005-09-16 18:43 ` David Brownell
2005-09-18 14:45 ` Mark Underwood
2005-09-30 1:02 ` David Brownell
2005-10-02 12:36 ` Mark Underwood
2005-10-03 4:47 ` David Brownell
2005-10-03 10:57 ` Mark Underwood
2005-10-03 11:07 ` Arjan van de Ven
2005-10-03 15:14 ` David Brownell
2005-10-03 15:23 ` Russell King
2005-10-03 15:40 ` David Brownell
2005-09-10 10:55 ` Vital
2005-09-10 11:54 ` Mark Underwood
2005-09-10 21:20 ` Vital
2005-09-11 8:35 ` Mark Underwood
2005-09-15 0:14 ` David Brownell
2005-09-26 16:50 ` Vitaly Wool [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=433826EE.9020107@rbcmail.ru \
--to=vitalhome@rbcmail.ru \
--cc=basicmark@yahoo.com \
--cc=david-b@pacbell.net \
--cc=dpervushin@ru.mvista.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox