From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752555AbaEWJWj (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 May 2014 05:22:39 -0400 Received: from mout.kundenserver.de ([212.227.17.13]:54582 "EHLO mout.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750906AbaEWJWh (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 May 2014 05:22:37 -0400 From: Arnd Bergmann To: Paul Bolle Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Russell King , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] [RESEND] ARM: remove last use of CONFIG_CPU_ARM710 Date: Fri, 23 May 2014 11:22:25 +0200 Message-ID: <4338460.K64agCvt26@wuerfel> User-Agent: KMail/4.11.5 (Linux/3.11.0-18-generic; KDE/4.11.5; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <1400836074.31526.14.camel@x220> References: <1364507176.1345.45.camel@x61.thuisdomein> <4305975.PvMXZQ020k@wuerfel> <1400836074.31526.14.camel@x220> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:WSohKupXMCHOAuOJ5Eh8fxdDQaCh8ziA+L73lHcLV1c 8mec3Lk6f6nTEgH6PAxFF+Fch2Shhkc4diKetW3Q2o3lST8MAx vDBGcqIzNmfspmMlgJHDT+UTVWVaGRWtPao39IApW2u8xgQk/X 4pWMDspCVgQQPfCE8MUjg26p5g722XjyTy+SNJcs3EdsDvF++r PiTMlWDOSGBiPMV3CFQ/ztUtpXMGPSq7mI+bEHy+GpC+p4x8IN Ll1RXinA/8UIdEp8PSnlZInJd5tktEVROgxVsMWIekG3HB5S/k iZoH1C7ROUjDL9jh4L33XuJoPY3xxjtZZLVIlW6RoCJXpFerlf vt7XLG36+Ut1vkDZcMvQ= Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Friday 23 May 2014 11:07:54 Paul Bolle wrote: > On Wed, 2014-05-14 at 11:28 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > On Wednesday 14 May 2014 11:25:50 Paul Bolle wrote: > > > On Wed, 2014-05-14 at 11:17 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > > 'git grep -i arm710' tells me that there is also some arm710 > > > > specific code in arch/arm/mm/proc-arm720.S that we may want to > > > > remove along with this. > > > > > > > > The DT binding should probably remain untouched though, I think it's > > > > correct to document the string. > > > > > > That seems to be cpu_arm710_name, __arm710_setup, and everything called > > > by __arm710_setup. Cleaning that up (as a separate patch) appears to be > > > trivial. If I do that it would be (sort of educated) guesswork. But I > > > don't mind doing it. What do you prefer? > > > > I think that would be great. For the first patch, please add > > > > Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann > > > > Once the second patch is reviewed, please add them both to Russell's > > patch tracker. > > Well, at least that second patch triggered a nice conversation. So I > should now add the first patch (with your ACK) to the tracker? Yes, please do that. Arnd