From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751347AbWHRKdX (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Aug 2006 06:33:23 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751349AbWHRKdX (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Aug 2006 06:33:23 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:7318 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751347AbWHRKdW (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Aug 2006 06:33:22 -0400 From: David Howells In-Reply-To: <20060818083911.GB7516@ucw.cz> References: <20060818083911.GB7516@ucw.cz> <20060814211504.27190.10491.stgit@warthog.cambridge.redhat.com> <20060814211507.27190.61876.stgit@warthog.cambridge.redhat.com> <7510.1155630597@warthog.cambridge.redhat.com> To: Pavel Machek Cc: David Howells , Andi Kleen , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org# Subject: Re: [RHEL5 PATCH 1/4] Provide fallback full 64-bit divide/modulus ops for gcc X-Mailer: MH-E 8.0; nmh 1.1; GNU Emacs 22.0.50 Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 11:33:08 +0100 Message-ID: <4341.1155897188@warthog.cambridge.redhat.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Pavel Machek wrote: > > There are places where the compiler emits these that aren't entirely > > obvious, one of which IIRC is in ext2 inode allocation. > > Well -- but that is good reason to keep that open-coded, right? Maybe. I'm not sure I agree, but Linus is permitted to have differing opinions. Anyway, that set of patches has been superseded since Al didn't want it done that way. David