From: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@colitti.com>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Cc: Nigel Cunningham <ncunningham@cyclades.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [swsusp] separate snapshot functionality to separate file
Date: Thu, 06 Oct 2005 01:18:41 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <43445F51.7090403@colitti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20051005230045.GA22906@elf.ucw.cz>
Pavel Machek wrote:
> "Cool, so you have done 100% of work and now it is stable, fast and
> tested. You only need to do 200% more work to get it merged".
>
> Merging into kernel is not easy, sorry.
Of course. I was just saying that it might be better for users if you,
Nigel and the other parties involved collaborated on getting suspend2
merged instead of working on 2 or 3 separate implementations. My gut
feeling is that it would be quicker to do that than to nail the sucky
low-level bugs that are bound to come up when developing the new uswsusp
framework.
And now, since there's nothing I can actually do to help this - you
can't learn to be a kernel hacker in two weeks - I'll shut up. But I
just wanted to remind everyone involved that from a user's perspective,
it would be great if suspend2 were merged.
It works, it's fast, it's stable, and it does what users want. That's a
strong combination. It would be really good if you could work together
to merge it.
Cheers,
Lorenzo
--
http://www.colitti.com/lorenzo/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-10-05 23:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-10-02 23:13 [swsusp] separate snapshot functionality to separate file Pavel Machek
2005-10-03 21:39 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-10-03 23:17 ` Pavel Machek
2005-10-04 15:11 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-10-04 20:53 ` Pavel Machek
2005-10-04 22:34 ` Nigel Cunningham
2005-10-05 8:41 ` Pavel Machek
2005-10-05 21:21 ` Lorenzo Colitti
2005-10-05 22:21 ` Nigel Cunningham
2005-10-05 22:44 ` Pavel Machek
2005-10-05 22:54 ` Lorenzo Colitti
2005-10-05 22:57 ` Pavel Machek
2005-10-05 23:00 ` Pavel Machek
2005-10-05 23:18 ` Lorenzo Colitti [this message]
2005-10-06 10:10 ` Alon Bar-Lev
2005-10-06 8:20 ` Pavel Machek
2005-10-09 23:41 ` Nigel Cunningham
2005-10-04 22:47 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-10-05 0:06 ` Pavel Machek
2005-10-05 8:20 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-10-05 8:33 ` Pavel Machek
2005-10-06 8:23 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-10-06 10:42 ` Pavel Machek
2005-10-06 13:29 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=43445F51.7090403@colitti.com \
--to=lorenzo@colitti.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ncunningham@cyclades.com \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox