public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@colitti.com>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Cc: Nigel Cunningham <ncunningham@cyclades.com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [swsusp] separate snapshot functionality to separate file
Date: Thu, 06 Oct 2005 01:18:41 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <43445F51.7090403@colitti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20051005230045.GA22906@elf.ucw.cz>

Pavel Machek wrote:
> "Cool, so you have done 100% of work and now it is stable, fast and
> tested. You only need to do 200% more work to get it merged".
> 
> Merging into kernel is not easy, sorry.

Of course. I was just saying that it might be better for users if you, 
Nigel and the other parties involved collaborated on getting suspend2 
merged instead of working on 2 or 3 separate implementations. My gut 
feeling is that it would be quicker to do that than to nail the sucky 
low-level bugs that are bound to come up when developing the new uswsusp 
framework.

And now, since there's nothing I can actually do to help this - you 
can't learn to be a kernel hacker in two weeks - I'll shut up. But I 
just wanted to remind everyone involved that from a user's perspective, 
it would be great if suspend2 were merged.

It works, it's fast, it's stable, and it does what users want. That's a 
strong combination. It would be really good if you could work together 
to merge it.


Cheers,
Lorenzo

-- 
http://www.colitti.com/lorenzo/

  reply	other threads:[~2005-10-05 23:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-10-02 23:13 [swsusp] separate snapshot functionality to separate file Pavel Machek
2005-10-03 21:39 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-10-03 23:17   ` Pavel Machek
2005-10-04 15:11     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-10-04 20:53       ` Pavel Machek
2005-10-04 22:34         ` Nigel Cunningham
2005-10-05  8:41           ` Pavel Machek
2005-10-05 21:21             ` Lorenzo Colitti
2005-10-05 22:21               ` Nigel Cunningham
2005-10-05 22:44               ` Pavel Machek
2005-10-05 22:54                 ` Lorenzo Colitti
2005-10-05 22:57                   ` Pavel Machek
2005-10-05 23:00                     ` Pavel Machek
2005-10-05 23:18                       ` Lorenzo Colitti [this message]
2005-10-06 10:10                         ` Alon Bar-Lev
2005-10-06  8:20                           ` Pavel Machek
2005-10-09 23:41                             ` Nigel Cunningham
2005-10-04 22:47         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-10-05  0:06           ` Pavel Machek
2005-10-05  8:20             ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-10-05  8:33               ` Pavel Machek
2005-10-06  8:23                 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-10-06 10:42                   ` Pavel Machek
2005-10-06 13:29                     ` Rafael J. Wysocki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=43445F51.7090403@colitti.com \
    --to=lorenzo@colitti.com \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ncunningham@cyclades.com \
    --cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
    --cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox