Re: "stable" vs "security stable"

[Bill Davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>]

Coywolf Qi Hunt wrote:
> On 10/9/05, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu <Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu> wrote:
> 
>>On Sun, 09 Oct 2005 15:44:38 +0800, Coywolf Qi Hunt said:
>>
>>>On 10/9/05, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu <Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu> wrote:
>>
>>>It is "security stable". Let's take this new notation from now on.
>>>"Security Stable" doesn't have to be all security related.
>>
>>Tell you what - you convince the -stable team, and I'll go along with it..
>>
> 
> 
> Better be "stable" and "base". 2.6.13.3 is the latest stable, 2.6.13
> is the latest base.

I think the idea of having the most recent "base release," and -stable, 
and -rc, and -git, are desirable, with some clear terms. Those of us who 
started with ftp and never felt the need for using a GUI have long since 
learned what to keep and where to find it, but I bet most people use the 
web by now.

-- 
    -bill davidsen (davidsen@tmr.com)
"The secret to procrastination is to put things off until the
  last possible moment - but no longer"  -me