From: Klaus Dittrich <kladit@arcor.de>
To: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Cc: linux mailing-list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 2.6.14-rc* / xinetd
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2005 20:27:00 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <434D5574.10405@arcor.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200510121745.j9CHj6XE023497@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote:
>On Wed, 12 Oct 2005 16:36:57 +0200, Klaus Dittrich said:
>
>
>>I noticed a huge cpu usage of xinetd with 2.6.14-rc4
>>starting with the first ntp request.
>>
>>
>
>Umm.. why is xinetd listening for ntp requests at all? I'm pretty sure that
>xinetd fighting with xntpd for control of the socket isn't going to work nicely,
>although I admit being mystified as to (a) why this ever worked for you and
>(b) what specifically changed in -rc4 to cause the CPU spin.
>
>What was the most recent kernel known to work, and what does the xinetd
>config file entry for NTP look like
>
>
2.6.13.3 works. I can compile an try 2.6.14-rc[1,2,3].
service time
{
type = INTERNAL
id = dgram_time
socket_type = dgram
protocol = udp
user = root
wait = yes
only_from = 192.168.168.36 192.168.168.39
}
This setup worked for years now. The machine
(192.168.168.32) is the time-server and I have
chosen this setup to simulate and verify a real
world scenario.
/etc/ntpd.conf
..
driftfile /etc/ntp.drift
logfile /var/log/ntp
#authenticate no
server 127.127.8.0 prefer mode 2 # Meinberg ANZ_14 (Standart Telegramm)
server 127.127.1.1 # Local clock in case of disaster
fudge 127.127.1.1 stratum 10 # Poor stratum for local clock
--
Klaus
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-10-12 18:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-10-12 14:36 2.6.14-rc* / xinetd Klaus Dittrich
2005-10-12 17:45 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2005-10-12 18:27 ` Klaus Dittrich [this message]
2005-10-12 20:13 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2005-10-13 7:02 ` Klaus Dittrich
2005-10-13 11:08 ` Klaus Dittrich
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=434D5574.10405@arcor.de \
--to=kladit@arcor.de \
--cc=Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox