Re: When is OSS going to go?

[John Richard Moser <nigelenki@comcast.net>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1



Alejandro Bonilla wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Oct 2005 14:48:37 -0400, John Richard Moser wrote
> 
>>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>Hash: SHA1
>>
>>Got a lkml.org link or a subject line I should search for?  "OSS remove"
>>"OSS sound remove" "Open sound system" all return garbage.
> 
> 
> Why would you want it to go away? People can decide from which one to use and
> make Linux more flexible.
> 

ever growing code base; I want it to go away for the same reason I'd
love a binary driver model in the kernel (in fact I'm looking at getting
fuse to supply the driver for my rootfs from initrd)

> Anyway, I think the archives say something like, it doesn't have to go away,
> so why remove it?
> 
> .Alejandro
> 

- --
All content of all messages exchanged herein are left in the
Public Domain, unless otherwise explicitly stated.

    Creative brains are a valuable, limited resource. They shouldn't be
    wasted on re-inventing the wheel when there are so many fascinating
    new problems waiting out there.
                                                 -- Eric Steven Raymond
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFDVUukhDd4aOud5P8RArBGAJ99rqujkD+9EAS5eWOVLpdztgLuGwCfdpk4
ucd/6eHiqJLiPjjTSTJxkHE=
=bz62
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----