From: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>
To: Robert Hancock <hancockr@shaw.ca>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Anybody know about nforce4 SATA II hot swapping + linux raid?
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2005 18:35:51 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <435578C7.1090504@tmr.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4350A1C5.3080902@shaw.ca>
Robert Hancock wrote:
> Lajber Zoltan wrote:
>
>> We have about 7 serverraid card from 4L to 5i. All of them is sitting on
>> shelf. They are pain to manage, ipssend tool is weak, serverdirector
>> complicated. And they are slow, the Fusion MPT SCSI with sw raid
>> significant faster, as we measured with bonnie++. Even the old aic7892 is
>> faster (these built-in scsi controllers on xseries motherboards).
>
>
> The 6i and 7 series of cards seem to have quite a bit better relative
> speeds. Certainly the 4Lx cards can be outperformed in simple "hdparm"
> tests by a 3ware SATA controller/disks of half the price..
>
> Plus, software RAID can't provide good performance on many server/DB
> applications without risking data loss in certain cases - for such
> things one really wants something with a battery-backed cache on it..
>
I just have a better feeling about hardware when there are dozens of
multi-TB servers from NY to CA. If it goes down IBM fixes it instead of
someone trying to get it back up at the console.
--
-bill davidsen (davidsen@tmr.com)
"The secret to procrastination is to put things off until the
last possible moment - but no longer" -me
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-10-18 22:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <4UXuH-EU-31@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <4VhD6-79H-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <4VnSe-hv-15@gated-at.bofh.it>
2005-10-08 19:09 ` Anybody know about nforce4 SATA II hot swapping + linux raid? Robert Hancock
[not found] ` <4XLQk-6Z2-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <4XMt3-7Yt-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
2005-10-15 6:29 ` Robert Hancock
2005-10-18 22:35 ` Bill Davidsen [this message]
2005-10-08 19:16 Allen Martin
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-10-07 10:11 Andrew Walrond
2005-10-08 7:41 ` Tejun Heo
2005-10-08 14:26 ` Molle Bestefich
2005-10-08 14:55 ` Andrew Walrond
2005-10-08 15:01 ` Lukasz Kosewski
2005-10-08 15:52 ` Andrew Walrond
2005-10-10 17:47 ` Ken Hwang
2005-10-08 15:23 ` Gordon Henderson
2005-10-08 16:03 ` Andrew Walrond
2005-10-08 16:08 ` John Stoffel
2005-10-08 16:39 ` Andrew Walrond
2005-10-15 4:24 ` Bill Davidsen
2005-10-15 5:06 ` Lajber Zoltan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=435578C7.1090504@tmr.com \
--to=davidsen@tmr.com \
--cc=hancockr@shaw.ca \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox