public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>
To: Robert Hancock <hancockr@shaw.ca>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Anybody know about nforce4 SATA II hot swapping + linux raid?
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2005 18:35:51 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <435578C7.1090504@tmr.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4350A1C5.3080902@shaw.ca>

Robert Hancock wrote:
> Lajber Zoltan wrote:
> 
>> We have about 7 serverraid card from 4L to 5i. All of them is sitting on
>> shelf. They are pain to manage, ipssend tool is weak, serverdirector
>> complicated. And they are slow, the Fusion MPT SCSI with sw raid
>> significant faster, as we measured with bonnie++. Even the old aic7892 is
>> faster (these built-in scsi controllers on xseries motherboards).
> 
> 
> The 6i and 7 series of cards seem to have quite a bit better relative 
> speeds. Certainly the 4Lx cards can be outperformed in simple "hdparm" 
> tests by a 3ware SATA controller/disks of half the price..
> 
> Plus, software RAID can't provide good performance on many server/DB 
> applications without risking data loss in certain cases - for such 
> things one really wants something with a battery-backed cache on it..
> 
I just have a better feeling about hardware when there are dozens of 
multi-TB servers from NY to CA. If it goes down IBM fixes it instead of 
someone trying to get it back up at the console.

-- 
    -bill davidsen (davidsen@tmr.com)
"The secret to procrastination is to put things off until the
  last possible moment - but no longer"  -me

  reply	other threads:[~2005-10-18 22:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <4UXuH-EU-31@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found] ` <4VhD6-79H-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found]   ` <4VnSe-hv-15@gated-at.bofh.it>
2005-10-08 19:09     ` Anybody know about nforce4 SATA II hot swapping + linux raid? Robert Hancock
     [not found] ` <4XLQk-6Z2-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found]   ` <4XMt3-7Yt-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
2005-10-15  6:29     ` Robert Hancock
2005-10-18 22:35       ` Bill Davidsen [this message]
2005-10-08 19:16 Allen Martin
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-10-07 10:11 Andrew Walrond
2005-10-08  7:41 ` Tejun Heo
2005-10-08 14:26   ` Molle Bestefich
2005-10-08 14:55     ` Andrew Walrond
2005-10-08 15:01       ` Lukasz Kosewski
2005-10-08 15:52         ` Andrew Walrond
2005-10-10 17:47         ` Ken Hwang
2005-10-08 15:23       ` Gordon Henderson
2005-10-08 16:03         ` Andrew Walrond
2005-10-08 16:08       ` John Stoffel
2005-10-08 16:39         ` Andrew Walrond
2005-10-15  4:24 ` Bill Davidsen
2005-10-15  5:06   ` Lajber Zoltan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=435578C7.1090504@tmr.com \
    --to=davidsen@tmr.com \
    --cc=hancockr@shaw.ca \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox