Re: lock_kernel twice possible ?

[Bill Davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>]

Coywolf Qi Hunt wrote:
> On 10/15/05, li nux <lnxluv@yahoo.com> wrote:
> 
>>Sorry, couldn't get what you want to say.
>>Can you please elaborate.
> 
> 
> http://www.zipworld.com.au/~akpm/linux/patches/stuff/top-posting.txt
> http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/T/top-post.html

The whole post fit on one screen and he was not continuing the 
conversation, he was commenting on your post as a whole. I think you're 
being a bit pedantic here.

I don't think his reply failed your criteria, it wasn't overlong, it 
didn't break a flowing discussion, and no backward reading was required.

~~~~~~~

Q:  Why is top-posting evil?

A1: Because top-posters tend to leave the entirety of the email to which
     they are replying intact, so the email gets too long.

A2: Because we prefer to use bottom-posting, and it is *extremely* hard to
     maintain a coherently flowing email conversation when some of the
     participants are bottom-posting and some are top-posting.

A3: backwards read don't humans because

-- 
    -bill davidsen (davidsen@tmr.com)
"The secret to procrastination is to put things off until the
  last possible moment - but no longer"  -me